2015 Pilot Discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
53Cactusboy said:
Got it. You're just a Richard Cranium (that couldn't fly your way out of a WET paper bag). Check...VERIFIED.
 
Might one mistake that drooling on "you'se" bib for a wager acceptance, widdle "spartan"? PM if so. Don't forget that you evidently feel that your "children and family members" have been "besmirch"ed son....?
 
It appears to me that 53CB is ecstatic about the Nic being used by the BOA... I mean it appears he is still apoplectic about the Nic and is sure they will win their next lawsuit...

He still seems bitter, spiteful, condescending, and "confident" that implementation of the Nic is imminent!!! I've yet to see any meaningful change in his attitude yet he wants us to believe he really knows something is different now. We shall see.
 
Pi brat said:
CB53, 53... whatever. Duuuude, you are on a copy/pasting role today! Let me help you.
 
"Nevertheless, we also recognize that it is not certain whether the Nicolau Award would have been implemented fully but for USAPA’s breach. Because a good faith attempt to implement the Nicolau Award would have ultimately required a ratification vote by all the pilots, and we cannot know what the results of such a vote would have been, we can never be certain whether efforts to implement the Nicolau Award through a collective bargaining agreement with US Airways would have succeeded."
 
"We decline to order the issuance of the West Pilots’ requested injunction “that an unmodified Nicolau Award must be used to order the seniority of the East and West pilots in the pending McCaskill-Bond process.” Although we have approved injunctions against nonparties, see SEC v. Wencke, 622 F.2d 1363, 1370(9th Cir. 1980), we decline to do so here, where USAPA is a party to this suit and enjoining it alone will provide effective relief to the West Pilots."
 
[SIZE=12pt]US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit                                                                       26 June 2015[/SIZE]
 

[SIZE=12pt]“…USAPA has served as the stalking horse for the East Pilots’ exclusive interests and left the West Pilots bereft of representation.  USAPA’s manifest disregard for the interests of the West Pilots and its discriminatory conduct towards them constitutes a clear breach of duty.  Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s conclusion that USAPA did not breach its duty of fair representation, and remand with instructions to enjoin USAPA from participating in the McCaskill-Bond proceedings except to the extent that USAPA will advocate the Nicolau Award..”[/SIZE]
 
****************************
 
[SIZE=12pt]“….This means that the new East Pilots Merger Committee will have to decide whether it is, in face, subject to the injunction….But if the members of the new committee are working with USAPA or USAPA’s agents, the injunction shall prohibit the new committee from advocating something other than the Nicolau Award.  Members of the new committee working in concert with USAPA who advocate something other than the Nicolau Award will be subject to contempt sanctions.  The new committee members and their counsel must decide, at their substancial peril, whether they are subject to the injunction…”[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=12pt]Roslyn O. Silver                                                                                                       22 September 2015[/SIZE]

[SIZE=12pt]Senior United States District Judge[/SIZE]
 
EastUS1 said:
 
Might one mistake that drooling on "you'se" bib for a wager acceptance, widdle "spartan"? PM if so. Don't forget that you evidently feel that your "children and family members" have been "besmirch"ed son....?
 
http://imgur.com/XftOP2B
 
Sorry.  My mother taught me better to not to play with cheats.
 
53Cactusboy said:
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit                                                                       26 June 2015
 

“…USAPA has served as the stalking horse for the East Pilots’ exclusive interests and left the West Pilots bereft of representation.  USAPA’s manifest disregard for the interests of the West Pilots and its discriminatory conduct towards them constitutes a clear breach of duty.  Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s conclusion that USAPA did not breach its duty of fair representation, and remand with instructions to enjoin USAPA from participating in the McCaskill-Bond proceedings except to the extent that USAPA will advocate the Nicolau Award..”
 
****************************
 
“….This means that the new East Pilots Merger Committee will have to decide whether it is, in face, subject to the injunction….But if the members of the new committee are working with USAPA or USAPA’s agents, the injunction shall prohibit the new committee from advocating something other than the Nicolau Award.  Members of the new committee working in concert with USAPA who advocate something other than the Nicolau Award will be subject to contempt sanctions.  The new committee members and their counsel must decide, at their substancial peril, whether they are subject to the injunction…”
 
Roslyn O. Silver                                                                                                       22 September 2015

Senior United States District Judge
Uh, have any sanctions been issued?
 
luvthe9 said:
My mom says take a good deal when offered to you!


Wye River.......
 
So...when the larger group thinks the arbitration is "unfair", the normal path is to RE-NEGOTIATE AWAY from the product of the agreed upon process???  Sorry, I don't thinks so. 
 
arbitration
Also found in: Dictionary, Thesaurus, Medical, Financial, Encyclopedia, Wikipedia.
Arbitration
The submission of a dispute to an unbiased third person designated by the parties to the controversy, who agree in advance to comply with the award—a decision to be issued after a hearing at which both parties have an opportunity to be heard.

Arbitration is a well-established and widely used means to end disputes. It is one of several kinds of Alternative Dispute Resolution, which provide parties to a controversy with a choice other than litigation. Unlike litigation, arbitration takes place out of court: the two sides select an impartial third party, known as an arbitrator; agree in advance to comply with the arbitrator's award; and then participate in a hearing at which both sides can present evidence and testimony. The arbitrator's decision is usually final, and courts rarely reexamine it….
 
53Cactusboy said:
Got it. You're just a Richard Cranium (that couldn't fly your way out of a WET paper bag). Check...VERIFIED.
CB 53........ Twitter post

"Christian, Husband, Father, America West / US Airways/ American Airlines Pilot and all around nice guy!"






Hypocrite........................yea, a real "Christian"
 
53Cactusboy said:
Sorry.  My mother taught me better to not to play with cheats.
 
And no doubt that you were somehow just a pwescious widdle baby and twuwy "special" apple of mom's eye as well. It's a pity you apparently weren't blessed with a father who might have suggested the concept of not running your mouth off when you've nothing to back it up with.
 
[SIZE=12pt]“….The Court’s patience with USAPA has run out.  USAPA avoided liability on the DFR claim by the slimmest of margins and the Court has serious doubts that USAPA will fairly and adequately represent all of its members while it remains a certified representative.  But all the Court can do at this stage is implore USAPA to, in the words of CAB, “make every effort to see that [the West Pilots’] are given extensive consideration, and that their interests are fairly and fully represented” during seniority integration…”[/SIZE]
 
[SIZE=12pt]Judge Roslyn O. Silver, Chief United States District Judge[/SIZE]

[SIZE=12pt]Case 2:13-cv-00471-ROS   Document 298   Filed 01/10/14[/SIZE]
 
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top