Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You still doubt the power of a majority that understands details..exB717Flyer said:Now this is funny. The BPR is trying to sabotage the settlement by resigning. Won't work.
Reconvened BPR Special Telephonic Meeting Recap
At 11 a.m. ET, the recessed BPR meeting was called to order by President Bradford to discuss progress in the settlement negotiations. The meeting, however, could not convene due to lack of a quorum. Jay Milkey for Washington, D.C., was the only BPR member present.
Additionally, over the previous two days, the USAPA Secretary Treasurer John Owens has received several resignations from BPR members which makes attaining a quorum difficult if not impossible.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:25 a.m.
I'm so pleased that you think this is funny. Negotiations were complete & agreed to in principle (let me know if you need help with that word). As USAPA's update says, there appears to be a mass exodus.Phoenix said:Looks like negotiations are on going.
"In principle"..? According to who?cactusboy53 said:I'm so pleased that you think this is funny. Negotiations were complete & agreed to in principle (let me know if you need help with that word). As USAPA's update says, there appears to be a mass exodus.
Hmmmmmm......walking away from an agreement in the hope of ducking responsibility / commitments. ....that seems so very familiar.
Phoenix said:"In principle"..? According to who?
Even if we assume there was an agreement in principle among some authorized subset of pilots or lawyers, obviously the agreement was contingent on others who actually posses the real authority..
Contingency.. Details... Majority.. Reality.. It's all so complicated for you fortune tellers. You miss the future over, and over, and over. Keep your day job.
cactusboy53 said:No. We're just waiting for all the pieces of the puzzle to fall into place..........
A320 Driver said:No one was ever taking your day job or "taking it from me" as you put it. I have never seen so much self victimization in my life! You'll ride on any bandwagon that comes by. But you and yours are the ONLY ones that believe all the hype you're claiming. The bottom line is, had the company offered us a reasonable contract, you would have had your NIC. But they played this seniority battle to the tune of a 1 billion dollar savings over 7 years. Their hands are not clean, but somehow, amazingly, they get away with it.
You'll believe anything that suits your purpose...
nic4us said:.First, there are 50,000 ALPA members .....
nic4us said:Second, the entire premise of the scab union was they could steal the West's seniority positions and award them to east pilots.
EastUS1 said:
So what? What good were those 50,000 ALPA members while ALPA sat by and watched managements throughout the industry gut contracts and steal pensions?.....
The only good thing that could be said for all of the nic nonsense is that the whole mess seems to be at least nearing it's end...finally.
EastUS1 said:
"You'se" were offered a compromise that fully protected PHX from east intrusion, with the stipulation that bidding out from PHX would be done based on date of hire. Explain exactly how that represented any attempt to "steal the West's seniority positions"...? Just curious here; is it even at all actually possible that you can honestly believe your own BS?
cactusboy53 said:
Sorry Michael. You CLEARY.....sorry clearly don't understand that the Nicolau list is the PRODUCT of a MUTUALLY AGREED UPON PROCESS. As such, you have NO RIGHT to ALTER that product in any way, shape or form. In other words.....doing so was deemed to be a breech of USAPA's DUTY OF FAIR REPRESENTATION.
You know, like the 9th RULED.
cactusboy53 said:
Were you dropped on your head as a child? ALPA, USAPA and now APA have spent countless funds determining if your pension was "stolen". While a tragedy, your pension was not taken away by ALPA national, engineered by ALPA national, or fostered by ALPA national.
If your statement is true, then DAL and UAL/CAL should have been under a LOA93-like contract. Considering the MUCH better place that they are in, I would look to blame your own local ALPA representation. Firing up a new "union" to take what does NOT belong to you was a FOOLS ERRAND (supported by fools).
Sorry Michael, but the reasons that AAA went the way of bankruptcy is squarely on AAA management's shoulders. Further, when the path was deemed a loss naturally they sought to keep the ship afloat off the backs of labor. It's just that simple.
I will agree with you, the "end" is near as determined by the BOA. They will read closing arguments and render a FEDERALLY FINAL & BINDING seniority list.