WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #16
at how many line stations does WN have maintenance?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After your inflammatory comments on the AA pilots forum with a person someone as yourself I get their side!WNMECH said:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aircraft-maintenance-technician-and-related-union-requests-federal-mediation-with-southwest-airlines-after-nearly-three-years-of-unproductive-bargaining-300109178.htmlDespite enjoying record profits last year of $1.1 billion, Southwest Airlines refuses to have meaningful negotiations with its Aircraft Maintenance Technician and Related union ‑ the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA) ‑ prompting the union to request federal mediation from the National Mediation Board (NMB).
As far as my observation, I totally get your managements decision in your case, thanx for making it for me ! Good luck you will need it!WNMECH said:Ridiculous. Just because you and your USAPA groupies disagree with anyone who believes that the 9th circuit was correct, doesn't make my comments inflammatory. You want to see me be inflammatory, stick around. The observations I posted in your low oxygen bubble, were tame. You guys should come out of the bubble and breath some fresh air, you will find that not many people support the tactics of USAPA.If you think my tame comment to the discussion was inflammatory, are you going to now denounce the responses to it that tried to denigrate me personally and used words like "nutcase" and "clown"?yeah, I didn't think so.
http://www.dallasnews.com/business/airline-industry/20150706-southwest-airlines-mechanics-seek-federal-mediation-on-contract-talks1.eceAs far as my observation, I totally get your managements decision in your case, thanx for making it for me ! Good luck you will need it!
We do not have an industry leading contract. UPS does. He is wrong about that because yes UPS is still in our very exact same industry. The company just hates to compare any group to UPS and says the reasons why are because they fly packages. The mediator for the dispatchers case was able to get SWA's leadership to use the UPS dispatchers in mediation ,hence the huge raise they received. Our nego team and the economist should all be doing the same during mediation. Where SWA screwed up big time was they could have had two top groups at SWA done and in the bank with average rages that were offered by the mechanics and the pilots. Now they will endure the cost of mediation as well as both groups increasing their asks as other groups have since increased at the other airlines and soon UPS will be done with their nego's for a new contract as they too have been talking for a couple years now and soon will be done. Same with the pilots, they could have had them in the bag at 3-5% and now the pilots will be comparing to the new delta increases, and they will be asking 15-20% now. See what delaying new contracts get you? Better comparos to use...WNMECH said:Southwest mechanics now have “an industry-leading agreement, and they will certainly have an industry-leading agreement when these negotiations are concluded,” it said.
I am saying exactly what I wrote.Are you saying that you agree with the company? Mechanics are mechanics. Servicing aircraft, repairing aircraft, ect... Plus we (passenger airlines mechanics) are responsible for many many human lives while the UPS mechs are responsible for 2 pilots and millions and/or billions of packages. A rather huge difference. Just the way I feel. When considering us as a passenger airline then we should be givin more consideration for the much more responsibility factor, just like all passenger airline pilots do when they nego rates of pay due to the larger aircraft they fly, because their responsibility for many more passengers increase...
This is one of the statements on another pilots' union board to which WNMECH is referring. He still hasn't learned to not interfere in other unions' affairs. I stand by the statement. Judge for yourselves:MUTATIS MUTANDIS said:After your inflammatory comments on the AA pilots forum with a person someone as yourself I get their side!
Agreed !CAVOK said:This is one of the statements on another pilots' union board to which WNMECH is referring. He still hasn't learned to not interfere in other unions' affairs. I stand by the statement. Judge for yourselves:
"One of the first lessons I learned over three decades ago as a member of organized labor was to stay out of other unions' business. SWA pilots are preparing for a strike. Their mechanics are asking for mediation in a contract that was amendable in 2012 and this clown, WNMECH, who has never learned that lesson is posting his opinion here. If he had something new, I would be open to it, but, it is just another biased opinion."
Hey man, throttle back a little. I never said your post was incorrect. And we both agree on on the logic. I was just asking if you were in agreement with the company for not using UPS mechanics wages and ours or any passenger airline. That's all, but I think I now have it...WNMECH said:I am saying exactly what I wrote.
We are the highest paid mechanics in the passenger airline industry, and still will be after our next contract, nothing more.
I am all for using your logic at the negotiating table.
That does not make my statement incorrect.
CAVOK said:This is one of the statements on another pilots' union board to which WNMECH is referring. He still hasn't learned to not interfere in other unions' affairs. I stand by the statement. Judge for yourselves:
"One of the first lessons I learned over three decades ago as a member of organized labor was to stay out of other unions' business. SWA pilots are preparing for a strike. Their mechanics are asking for mediation in a contract that was amendable in 2012 and this clown, WNMECH, who has never learned that lesson is posting his opinion here. If he had something new, I would be open to it, but, it is just another biased opinion."
This is the little post I made that got you to offer me your 3 decades of lessons learned.WNMECH said:Exactly.
The 9th made its thoughts known on this issue without tying the hands of the SLI arbitrators.
The new East committee, (minus USAPA) are free to bring whatever list they want but 9th ruling was meant to influence the arbitrators without usurping their authority.
That is the reason behind this:
12 We decline to order the issuance of the West Pilots’ requested injunction “that an unmodified Nicolau Award must be used to order the seniority of the East and West pilots in the pending McCaskill-Bond process.”
The 9th removed USAPA, but left it open to be a fair process to all three groups.
The West got exactly what they needed from the 9th.
A ruling that USAPA was in violation of the DFR, that the Nic should have been used all along, and a fair unfettered arbitration can still continue (preventing more legal problems).
The East guys are delusional if they think the arbitrators wont consider the mountains of evidence that everyone else sees.
The 9th ruling is powerful evidence that the Nic should be used to some extent in aligning the East and West before then combining with the AA.
These arbitrators know that if they throw out the Nic, they ultimately increase the likelihood that their own future rulings could be ignored.
Why would arbitrators try to undermine the arbitration system?
No matter what list the East brings now, the damage has already been done to them by the 9th.
No problem.swamt said:Hey man, throttle back a little. I never said your post was incorrect. And we both agree on on the logic. I was just asking if you were in agreement with the company for not using UPS mechanics wages and ours or any passenger airline. That's all, but I think I now have it...