eolesen
Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2003
- Messages
- 15,959
- Reaction score
- 9,374
Environmental regulations are reasonable, but they can also go into the ridiculous.
There's a piece of land in Michigan which was used by a railroad for over 100 years, but turned into a trail a couple years ago under the railbanking laws which allow unused railroads to be turned into trails, with the understanding they can revert back to rail use.
Now the railroad wants to re-install the rails. The law says they're allowed to do that. Only problem is that now, they have to do brand new environmental impact studies, etc., all to revert the land's designated use to what it was just four years ago.... Appeasing the tree huggers by removing the rails for recreational use has now bitten them squarely in the ass. Next time, they'll just leave the rails in place even if it does screw over the bikers, ATV and snowmobile users who benefit from the clean trail today...
It's also intrusive to have the government tells a business they can't relocate work from one state to another (e.g. Boeing wanted to move assembly work from Washington to South Carolina), and endure three years of legal battles to do what they'd be free to do in any other industry.
Those are just a few examples... there are countless more, but hey, why confuse opinions with facts?...
Abortion? Please, can you actually identify a Tea Party conservative who is trying to outlaw abortion?....
It's a convenient lightning rod issue to bring up, but being opposed to something on moral grounds, and trying to outlaw it are mutually exclusive.
There's a piece of land in Michigan which was used by a railroad for over 100 years, but turned into a trail a couple years ago under the railbanking laws which allow unused railroads to be turned into trails, with the understanding they can revert back to rail use.
Now the railroad wants to re-install the rails. The law says they're allowed to do that. Only problem is that now, they have to do brand new environmental impact studies, etc., all to revert the land's designated use to what it was just four years ago.... Appeasing the tree huggers by removing the rails for recreational use has now bitten them squarely in the ass. Next time, they'll just leave the rails in place even if it does screw over the bikers, ATV and snowmobile users who benefit from the clean trail today...
It's also intrusive to have the government tells a business they can't relocate work from one state to another (e.g. Boeing wanted to move assembly work from Washington to South Carolina), and endure three years of legal battles to do what they'd be free to do in any other industry.
Those are just a few examples... there are countless more, but hey, why confuse opinions with facts?...
Abortion? Please, can you actually identify a Tea Party conservative who is trying to outlaw abortion?....
It's a convenient lightning rod issue to bring up, but being opposed to something on moral grounds, and trying to outlaw it are mutually exclusive.