White House Panic Mode?

[tech2101]

One more tactic of losing a debate on a board like this:

Start a new thread.

(You can easily see who needs to do this very often in order to change the subject)

 

[Freedom4all]

I know where you lie on the political spectrum, Bob, which is why it's hard for me to get why you're (at least tacitly) endorsing tyranny.

So you now think protest and decent that is protected via free speech is now tyranny? How is that?

Is not the ACORN then guilty of the same? SEIU? The dems under the Bush administration? There was no tyranny then when people were exercising free speech then?

 

[Freedom4all]

One more tactic of losing a debate on a board like this:

Start a new thread.

(You can easily see who needs to do this very often in order to change the subject)

Or I could just inject blather like you rather then join in on the debate. Right mate?

 

[Kev3188]

So you now think protest and decent that is protected via free speech is now tyranny? How is that?

How is stifling the ability of someone to speak to the elected representative freedom of speech? You can talk all you want; when you take away MY right to free speech, then there's a problem.

The fact that these people are masquerading as "common folk" (as you put it) in order to further an insidious agenda just makes it all the worse.

 

[Kev3188]

Truth is tryanny is tyranny no matter where you are on the political spectrum...

Well, at least we agree on something.

That said, if you're so against-and were during the Bush years-why are these types of tactics okay now?

 

[Freedom4all]

Heres some reading for you Kev and my bud Techie

Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies

 

[Freedom4all]

How is stifling the ability of someone to speak to the elected representative freedom of speech? You can talk all you want; when you take away MY right to free speech, then there's a problem.

The fact that these people are masquerading as "common folk" (as you put it) in order to further an insidious agenda just makes it all the worse.

You mean telling a lying politician they are lying is stifling free speech? They wanted people to come and debate the health care scam and they got far more then they were expecting, they were surprised at the overwhelming opposition to it. Have you not seen the recent polls to back it up?

You call that stifling? Do you serve your politicians or are they not supposed to serve you? Which is it?

 

[tech2101]

Heres some reading for you Kev and my bud Techie

That deserved a new thread, did it not?

 

[Freedom4all]

That deserved a new thread, did it not?

Maybe, but thanks for reminding me...I have another i need to post.

 

[Kev3188]

You mean telling a lying politician they are lying is stifling free speech? They wanted people to come and debate the health care scam and they got far more then they were expecting, they were surprised at the overwhelming opposition to it. Have you not seen the recent polls to back it up?

You call that stifling? Do you serve your politicians or are they not supposed to serve you? Which is it?

In furthering their agenda, these people are not allowing the electorate to speak directly with their representatives. How is a politician I elected supposed to "serve" me if he cannot hear what I-and the people in my community- have to say?

If you can't see what's wrong with that, I can't help you.

 

[Freedom4all]

In furthering their agenda, these people are not allowing the electorate to speak directly with their representatives. How is a politician I elected supposed to "serve" me if he cannot hear what I-and the people in my community- have to say?

If you can't see what's wrong with that, I can't help you.

Huh? You obviously haven't looked into any of this and are no more aware of what the details are past the sound bites on the liberal MSM.

Have you even bothered to read the text of the proposed health care bill? No of course not.

Heres what happen, representatives were allowing people to ask questions. And people did ask very pointed questions. The replies were ridiculous. Also representatives were saying some out right BS that the crowd responded accordingly. It was all very black and white, not an ACORN SEIU takeover. There were no "Buses" of operatives from insurance companies, etc. If you were educated on the subject you would be well aware of that. But alas...you are not, nor are you willing to. And for that...I cant help you...mate.

 

[Kev3188]

Oh please you have no hard evidence and even f you did it would be meaningless as there is no law against this type of thing.

So a leaked internal memo explicitly outlining the strategy doesn't count?

I can't help but notice that those who are so outraged now will go on to spend millions of dollars to restrict ballot access for the Libertarian Party.

Not this cat. I think any party should be on the ballot-and in my state, they were...

Personally, I'd like to see the House set up on a percentage basis, wherein if you get, say, 14% of the popular vote, you have 14% of the seats. That's just my opinion, of course, and I harbor no illusions that it'll happen in my lifetime.

 

[Freedom4all]

Why are people getting angry?

Because he's a habitual LIAR and uses his lies to further his socialist agenda. Thats why.

PolitiFact

When President Barack Obama gave a speech on the economy in Wakarusa, Ind., on Aug. 5, 2009, one of his statements raised the eyebrows of one alert PolitiFact reader.

Obama, touting an element of his stimulus package, said that a tax cut “began showing up in paychecks of 4.8 million Indiana households about three months ago.â€￾

That struck our reader as odd because the Census Bureau pegs Indiana’s population at 6.3 million, of which one quarter are under 18. What’s the likelihood that the remaining 4.8 million Indiana adults each constitute their own household?

Not likely at all.

 

[Kev3188]

Huh? You obviously haven't looked into any of this and are no more aware of what the details are past the sound bites on the liberal MSM.

Huh nothing. It was a straight forward question. Try and answer it w/o attempting to shout me down.

Have you even bothered to read the text of the proposed health care bill? No of course not.

Actually, I have. Awful assumptive of you to think otherwise, don't you think?

Have you?


P.S. I miss when you used to call me Tiger and use lots of emoticons. Such simpler times (sigh)...

 

[Freedom4all]

So a leaked internal memo explicitly outlining the strategy doesn't count?



Not this cat. I think any party should be on the ballot-and in my state, they were...

Personally, I'd like to see the House set up on a percentage basis, wherein if you get, say, 14% of the popular vote, you have 14% of the seats. That's just my opinion, of course, and I harbor no illusions that it'll happen in my lifetime.

And yet you still seem not to realize that the majority of America does not want Obamacare. Have you been ignoring the polls as well?