[blockquote]
----------------
On 1/29/2003 10:08:38 AM TWAFA007 wrote:
Aloha bagsmasher,
Boy you really are just a one trick pony. First all TWA F/As were stapled. None were put ahead of AA F/As. Secound at the time of the TWA purchase AA was expanding. They were planing to hire over 2000 more F/As that year. If it wasnt for the TWA purchase all of the labor cuts would have been all AA. The TWA gave AA a cush to cut back. The vast majority of AMR employees on the street today have come form the TWA side of the, "fence."
[/blockquote]
Please if he is a one trick pony, you must be his long lost twin. You manage to bring the seniority thing up in 95% or better of your posts.
[blockquote]
Your attitude toward management is exactly the attitude that has brought down many a mighty airline. The fact that you feel that AA doesnt have to change the contracts shows that you really dont have a clue. Like I said in another thread I feel we will see history repeat itself. You right. Dont give in. Show them who is really the boss. When AA fails you can always say that it was, "management fault."
ALOHA, 007
----------------
[/blockquote]
If AA showed us today that the 3% cut would make the difference of survival, or even it giving us the edge to take out the competition. We would be there. There is no good argument to say the 130 million will save AA, when we waste far more than that on a weekly or monthly basis.
----------------
On 1/29/2003 10:08:38 AM TWAFA007 wrote:
Aloha bagsmasher,
Boy you really are just a one trick pony. First all TWA F/As were stapled. None were put ahead of AA F/As. Secound at the time of the TWA purchase AA was expanding. They were planing to hire over 2000 more F/As that year. If it wasnt for the TWA purchase all of the labor cuts would have been all AA. The TWA gave AA a cush to cut back. The vast majority of AMR employees on the street today have come form the TWA side of the, "fence."
[/blockquote]
Please if he is a one trick pony, you must be his long lost twin. You manage to bring the seniority thing up in 95% or better of your posts.
[blockquote]
Your attitude toward management is exactly the attitude that has brought down many a mighty airline. The fact that you feel that AA doesnt have to change the contracts shows that you really dont have a clue. Like I said in another thread I feel we will see history repeat itself. You right. Dont give in. Show them who is really the boss. When AA fails you can always say that it was, "management fault."
ALOHA, 007
----------------
[/blockquote]
If AA showed us today that the 3% cut would make the difference of survival, or even it giving us the edge to take out the competition. We would be there. There is no good argument to say the 130 million will save AA, when we waste far more than that on a weekly or monthly basis.
