A320 Driver
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2002
- Messages
- 3,358
- Reaction score
- 2,319
No, I do not. I'll defer to you and nycbusdriver, as your reasoning may be more sound, but it looks like we agree on one thing: in a merger, PHL is not likely to be "STL'd" the way STL was. Philly is a gigantic metro area that supports a lot of airline traffic, and US dominates that airport.
Proximity to NYC isn't going to mean that the world's largest airline (if US and AA combine) will choose one or the other. As I'm sure we all agree, the proposed merger isn't about slashing capacity like in the old days - it's about growth and becoming larger.
As Ted Reed wrote recently, if PHL is cutback, it won't be due to a merger - it will be due to overly ambitious and expensive building projects that threaten to bust the budget.
I was at Parker's presentation at USAPA headquarters. According to him, they have no intention whatsoever of cutting back PHL or CLT. As stated, JFK is saturated and according to Mr. Parker, not worth a damn for connections. Same scenario with MIA and CLT. On a side note, the increased revenue we would pick up in medium sized cites with a combined LCC/AA is staggering. If those numbers are confirmed, it will paint a revenue picture that would make the combined airline a force to be reckoned with.
Driver...