Using the Olympics to push the Gay Agenda.

The media keeps pushing the sick gay lifestyle in hopes of people embracing it.  The US is tolerant of the sodemites, but I don't know anyone that wishes they have a child that turns out gay.
 
Ms Tree said:
When did equality become an "agenda"?
 
 
One of George Soros’s pet projects is same-sex “marriage”. Twenty years ago nobody had it and nobody thought they wanted it. Then aggressive LGBT militants looking for something to be angry about  dreamt up the idea they wanted to get “married” to each other and George Soros offered them his funding. He has a timetable for getting “gay” marriage on the statute book in America and when he says jump the President says “how high?”
 

In 2011 he bought millions of $ worth of shares in the Target chainstore business, and the following season they launched a range of pro-gay-marriage clothing. T-shirts, jogging suits and hoodies all blazoned with the slogan “Equal marriage now”. See any  connection? Of course Soros is not the only big tycoon funding the LGBT movement but without a doubt he is one of the worst bullies
 
Black Magic said:
The media keeps pushing the sick gay lifestyle in hopes of people embracing it.  The US is tolerant of the sodemites, but I don't know anyone that wishes they have a child that turns out gay.
Embrase ... no. Rocognize and legalize yes. I agree that I do not think people want a gay child but I think most parants love their children regadless of sexual orientation.
 
Ms Tree said:
Embrase ... no. Rocognize and legalize yes. I agree that I do not think people want a gay child but I think most parants love their children regadless of sexual orientation.
 
Can one procreate through anal intercourse?
 
Why wouldn't people want a gay child?
 
I thought gay was cool....
 
You infer something is wrong then with being gay.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
 
 yes. I agree that I do not think people want a gay child
 
 
What's wrong with this picture?
Our crusader for gay rights admits no one wants a gay child??
surprised-002.gif
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #12
Dog Wonder said:
I'm guessing you prefer the Russian "morality".
I think the Olympics is an inappropriate venue to push a political agenda. The people that chose the location the Olympics are being held were fully aware of Russian law.The fact that Sochi was obviously ill equipped to host guest (judging from the stories about the horrible hotels and infrastructure) I do not think it is outside of the realm of possibility that this situation was planned from the start to push a political agenda.
 
What ever happened to guest respecting the laws of the lands they visit? Russia is within their rights to enforce the laws of the land. Maybe America should try it some time.
 
 
Let's look at the requirements for a host city.
 
1) The city must prove that it is big enough to handle the Olympics. With the games come a huge number of tourists, athletes, journalists, and politicians. They must show that they can host the games in new stadiums and venues, they must house all the people in adequate hotels, and they have to transport everyone from one place to the next with a reliable mass transit system. They also need to show that they can handle the high level of security needed at the games.
 
2) The city needs to convince residents that the expenses of covering the Olympics (which may be covered by raising taxes) are worth it in city improvement and new jobs.
 
3) The cities needs to maintain a highly positive media exposure to carry the games.  (Translation: The MEDIA has a great influence on where the games are held and most media is liberal,  at least here in the US)
 
4) Fourth, the tangible effects of hosting the Olympic games may not prove beneficial if the bid committees do not exercise proper judgment in developing the city to host the Olympics.
 
The bolded statements in 1 and 3 should have disqualified Sochi. It is obvious this was a "hit job" from the very beginning.
 
delldude said:
What's wrong with this picture?
Our crusader for gay rights admits no one wants a gay child??
surprised-002.gif
I think that represents the fact that parents want their child to be accepted and to fit in.

We can only hope that one day all children and adults will be accepted no matter what sexual orientation god decided to bless them with.
 
Force Majeure said:
I think that represents the fact that parents want their child to be accepted and to fit in.

We can only hope that one day all children and adults will be accepted no matter what sexual orientation god decided to bless them with.
 
Book I read says God has issues with these acts......how could He then bless them?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top