No, buying some unsecured debt does not give US "a seat" at anything, nor will US get any more info about "future moves by AA in BK" than any other unsecured creditor. Some have mistakenly thought that US is now a member of the Official Unsecured Creditor Committee and that's not accurate. US is no more a member of the UCC as I am.I think your right. It's pretty much going to happen guys, rather in or out of BK is the question. This latest action by Parker was position move. This gives them a seat as a creditor, now they are involved as well as informed on future moves by AA in BK. Parker has also offered to keep AA's HQ in FW as well as the name. How could any one deny him a merger. The only reason AA does not want a merger to happen while they are in BK is because US management team will prevail at the helm. This is the only thing that neither side is willing to admitt until it becomes reality.
How could anyone deny him a merger? Easy, if the US plan is shown to transfer more of AA's value to US shareholders and less to AA's creditors than AA's POR.
US is the airline in dire need of a lifeline while AA is the one in Ch 11, trimming its costs to enable something AA hasn't seen in a long time - and that's organic growth. Notice how WN grew so much over the years? That's because WN had low costs and lower cost carriers tend to grow while higher cost carriers retreat and contract. jetBlue grew and grew at AA's expense because of its bargain basement startup costs. Now it's AA's turn to grow, which airlines can only do if they have lower costs than others (or supply superior service).
That's putting the cart before the horse. Like picking out drapes, carpet and furniture for a house on which you made an offer, but on which others are making offers. Integration discussions can wait until the merger is a certainty, not while it's still just Doug Parker's fantasy.On a second note, the TWU better start focussing on integration discussions between them and the IAM.