Barbie you stay up late.. damn.. I love my new China flight at ual. After we got China all the senior people transfer in from ord,den and far as sfo to fly this #### and commute for this trip..
Barbie you stay up late.. damn.. I love my new China flight at ual. After we got China all the senior people transfer in from ord,den and far as sfo to fly this #### and commute for this trip..
After we got China all the senior people transfer in from ord,den and far as sfo to fly this #### and commute for this trip..
Delta has my support. US Airways, as mismanaged as it has become, is not a suitable carrier for this route.
Maybe one day you'll figure out the best way to do that: stop using the vendor.There are MANY ways to show one displeasure with a vendor.
US Airways applies for China service
If successful in their bid service will start in March 2009 with seven weekly roundtrips using 269 seat Airbus A340 aircraft.
Very true. When DOT route awards are handed out, the Government Agency should look at an airlines Capability in serving the route not only on equipment but RELIABILITY of Carriage, Passenger Satisfaction (DOT complaint ratio) and Competitiveness of Product. The current state of US requires the Management to focus on serving Altoona and not Beijing. (Even though the anticipated service is NOT planned until 2009, the route should be awarded to an established carrier that is CAPABLE of delivering the SERVICE.......an application from US belongs in File "Z", and I will tell them that in my letter)Not only will US not get it, they don't deserve to get it. There is no point in expanding into new markets and routes when you are utterly incapable of properly managing what you currently have.
Since international (and domestic for that matter) operations are nowhere near reliable at this time, they should give up on this and concentrate on making what they already have work properly.
we cant even travel in the conus and get from pt a to pt b
can you imagine china may be we will land at the same airport as amelia earhart.
Did you all get this part. Service starts in CLT on a 767, goes to PHL then switches to a A340. Don't we have better things to be doing with our widebodies? Why not put a 321 on this part of the route? What am I missing here?