usfliboi said:Im trying to figure out whats misleading? If you disagree with newspaper article who quoted a source, call the paper and the source. No body on here knows exactly where afa and cwa stands including pitbull. Please, read the article again.
I think most of us HAVE read the article. The entire premise that "AFA & CWA ready to sign new deal," based on five words uttered by a pilot representative with an agenda, is just ludicrous. He's not a member of either of those unions (let alone their leadership), so how would he have the faintest clue of what they plan to do? One MUST consider the source, and in this context, the source is just not credible. Basing the title of a thread on a source with no credibility is misleading. And it's poor journalism on the newpaper's part to print that sort of assertion without checking the veracity of the statement with those particular unions. I mean, I could go talk to a reporter and say that Bronner is going to drop a couple of billion into UAIR tomorrow because he feels sorry for the employees. Does that make it true?
And you can bet that if AFA and CWA were "ready to sign," the company spinmeisters would be hammering that into the pilots on an hourly basis. The absence of such rhetoric implies the opposite..