BoeingBoy
Veteran
- Nov 9, 2003
- 16,512
- 5,865
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #16
ktflyhome,
You are correct in that our (U's) non-personnel costs have risen. This quote from article #2 sums it up. "And unit costs increase as capacity is reduced unless the costs are lowered by the same percentage." We cut capacity by probably more than any network carrier (in percentage) without a corresponding decrease in many of our fixed costs - a perfect example is gate leases. Since capacity decreased faster than non-personnel costs, the non-personnel side continued to increase as measured by cost per ASM, more than offsetting the reduced personnel costs. Hence our overall cost per ASM also continued to increase, just not as fast as it ould have without the labor concessions.
Jim
You are correct in that our (U's) non-personnel costs have risen. This quote from article #2 sums it up. "And unit costs increase as capacity is reduced unless the costs are lowered by the same percentage." We cut capacity by probably more than any network carrier (in percentage) without a corresponding decrease in many of our fixed costs - a perfect example is gate leases. Since capacity decreased faster than non-personnel costs, the non-personnel side continued to increase as measured by cost per ASM, more than offsetting the reduced personnel costs. Hence our overall cost per ASM also continued to increase, just not as fast as it ould have without the labor concessions.
Jim