I didn't know what you were talking about with "lease agreement with Jet blue," but today's post helps.boston said:Does this mean there will be an increase
Of flights to or thru these mentioned cities. Not sure
About IAM, but doesn't a station must have 20 something
Flights to remain a TWU station?
Maybe we will see AA getting back or terminating
The lease agreement with Jet blue for somebody
Cities.
VX doesn't lease any "routes" from AA. VX doesn't lease anything from AA, except a few EWR slots. Before the merger, WN leased a few LGA slots from AA and B6 leased a few DCA slots from AA. The merger settlement agreement required AA to permanently transfer those leased slots to WN and B6.boston said:So the thread isn't clear, I thought it was a given AA is in charge. Big jets what else do have to say now that it's very clear that AA is in charge. Question is with AA informing the US union that they will be using IAM/TWU employees to do more work in these stations that were previously mentioned and end the contract with Eulen, or who ever, will we see increased AA metal into and out of these places., especially SJU, BDL,BOS,TPA ect. Maybe ending some of the route leases to JetBlue, and in PDX Virgin America. Virgin leases at least 15 AA routes out of SFO.
I would bet serious money that AA will never add more capacity to SJU. Those days are long gone. B6 is now the big carrier to SJU. The only way that would change would be for AA to buy/merge with B6.
If new AA is restoring mainline ground employees to cities where they were previously outsourced, that just shows that AA's ground employees are very low paid, enabling them to effectively compete against the outsourced companies.