KCFlyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 11,358
- 1,428
Otherwise all the farmers would want to grow is low maintenance high yield crops. There is also the benefit of expanded dietary options to the general public.
But we are paying them to grow corn to make ethanol and high fructose corn syrup. Why not pay for sugar cane or beets, which produce more ethanol than corn? Why subsidize ethanol at all? There was a HUGE outcry about "wasteful spending" on solyndra and solar power....why are you willing to give a pass to "corn power"?
Last edited: