La Li Lu Le Lo
Veteran
- May 29, 2010
- 7,414
- 2,649
A 747 is designed to run that way. The Texas power grid is not. 1 engine having an issue is far more likely than a statewide winter storm in Texas. Stop denying reality in favor of pushing your absurd examples to justify your flawed agendas.They also mention 25% loss in capacity (acutally it's less) but if a 747 loses one engine (25% of it's capacity), is it going to auger in?
Texas did what was cost appropriate. Despite living by the lake I don't buy flood insurance because I live on top of a massive hill. The risk does not justify the cost. The risk of a statewide winter storm overloading the electric grid is possible but unlikely. The risk does not justify the cost. I am sure Texans would much rather have lower power bills than fund millions of dollars for something they might use 'MIGHT USE" once every few decades. The reason this is news is because it is the exception not the rule.And again...how'd they keep those windmills in Canada and the northern US running? Texas cut a few corners. Don't blame the windmills.
I guess in your world they should just stop building skyscrapers because a bunch of Muslim jihadist MIGHT ram a jet into them.