Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I stand corrected on the details leaking out slowly prior to ratification. It seems that AFA has the agreement on their Council 57 (FL FA's) website.
Jim
Do you have a link to the AFA web site?
DOH is never acceptable...
Ok , let me rephrase that as a question,, if DOH is fair, then what in the big picture are the AT FA;s giving up to counterweigh the 30-50% pay raises and incredible amounts of new flexibility????? How have they shown any GOOD FAith or appreciation for $35k a year newly found income???????????????According to who?
It's really two sides of the same coin. Whether the WN FA's get an extra 2.5 years credit for placement on the combined list or the FL FA's get 2.5 years less the effect is the same - a FL FA's position on the combined list would be after a WN FA hired 2.5 years after them. I don't know when the most senior FL FA was hired, but using 1/1/94 as an example, every WN FA hired on or prior to 7/1/96 would be above that FL FA on the combined list. A greater number of WN FA's won't have a single FL FA above them than a pure DOH integration, and most if not all WN FA's will have fewer FL FA's ahead of them on the combined list.
I guess one could argue that the extra 2.5 years seniority for placement on the combined list is too little - it should have been 5 or 10 years. But at some point the combined list would start to look like the FL FA's were stapled to the bottom of the WN list.
Jim