Correct me if I am wrong but doesn't PIT charge a ridiculous PSGR airport fee and that's one of the reasons we bailed on PIT......
You are partially correct.......The per passenger fee is directly related to the number of flights and passengers moving through the airport......
When US had 500+ flights a day, the fees were a bit higher then other airports but not much......
Then every time US pulled flights out, the fees went up along with the flight cuts......
So basically US kept crying wolf while it was their own decisions that created the problem in the 1st place......
Then they chose to cancel the leases on the gates during the 2nd BK and since that time have paid higher month-to-month lease rates for 20+ gates instead of the much lower long-term lease rates they had in place.......They also walked away from one of the best deals in the entire country when it came to revenue sharing as included in the leases were a cut of other incoming revenues at the airport such as parking revenue......
As you can see, it was managements decision to break these deals and then they continue to try and turn it around on everyone else and place blame anywhere they can except where it should be....with themselves......
As for the situation now...as I stated before a committee in PIT approached this management team nearly two years ago and showed them how the costs in PIT could be lowered significantly, by doing exactly what they are finally doing now....Dumping the 18 excess very high cost short-term leased gates, eliminating a sub-contracted group of 350 employees (this group had around 500 when the committee met) combining all the flights under 1 umbrella basically shaving around 7-8 million a year alone in excess unneeded costs........
Mr. Gray blamed local officials for US Airways' long, slow exodus, saying they "blew it big time." Airports in Charlotte and Philadelphia, he said, have lower costs to handle connecting traffic, and "I truly believe that has been a major factor in this whole process."
Mr. Onorato said,
"It was US Airways that made the decision to pull out the hub after this region subsidized, gave all kinds of incentives ... gave US Airways a monopoly, 90 percent of the gates. After all of that they said, 'Oh, by the way, we don't want to be here.' Not only that, they go into bankruptcy and coming out of bankruptcy we're the only city that they canceled all their leases.
"This was their decision. No one blew it. The only one that blew it was US Airways. They blew it because they couldn't figure out how to run their company."
The problem now is that since the committee met two years ago, management continued their onslaught of feeder flight cuts so much that there is basically nothing left now.....Had this management team listened and continued to work with the committee instead of stonewalling it, PIT would probably look quite different today and may have actually been a very successful focus city for the airline...
Although mainline is somewhat salvaged by this latest move, I feel it's only a matter of time before Doug and Co. cry some more and continue the downsize.....one just need to listen to comments made in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07277/822782-28.stm
Is this, he was asked, the last of the cuts?
"You never say never," Mr. Parker said. At the same time, "we certainly don't anticipate further cuts going forward. ... We don't want to go through this pain. We are getting to what we think is the right size."
And how many times has he said that before?