SEND SENATOR CHUCK A NICE "HELLO"

Sen. Schumer, who's my state Senator, had the decency to call me himself to inquire about how I was doing, and If I needed ANYTHING in conjunction with the WORSE day in my life, 1 day after the official "U S Military Knock on the Door" !

"FOX NEWS" would do well to judge a man by the content of his character, as opposed to his(and our) human shortcomings !

As a person who will wager occasionally, my "marker" is somewhere in the middle between the Senator and the F/A !

Chuck Schumer or any politician NEVER does anything that doesn't benefit him directly. While I've no doubt his call was of great comfort in your darkest hour, bet dollars to donuts it was a calculated move on his part.
 
Err, that Schumers spokesman apparentely validified with this statement:

"The senator made an off-the-cuff comment under his breath that he shouldn’t have made, and he regrets it," Schumer spokesman Brian Fallon reportedly told Politico.com.

Please read the entire post next time Garf ! Just sayin' :blink:


Post 9 first two sentences. That not being true, see post 12. She might have had it coming. That not being true, then he was a prick. Numerous options, none of which have any supporting evidence other than the fact that most politicians are slimy.
 
Post 9 first two sentences. That not being true, see post 12. She might have had it coming. That not being true, then he was a prick. Numerous options, none of which have any supporting evidence other than the fact that most democratic politicians are slimy.
There. I fixed it for you. :up:
 
Ginrich, Foley, Vitter, Mark Sanford, Robert "Bob" Allen, Larry Craig, just to name a few. Does this mean that you approve of their behavior? Or is that just another instance of your bias and ignorance coming through again? To even suggest that one party is more/less slimy than the other is laughable.
 
Ginrich, Foley, Vitter, Mark Sanford, Robert "Bob" Allen, Larry Craig, just to name a few. Does this mean that you approve of their behavior? Or is that just another instance of your bias and ignorance coming through again? To even suggest that one party is more/less slimy than the other is laughable.


This is why I'm gonna run.

I have a great Slogan

SparrowHawk For President - Could It Get Worse
 
Ginrich, Foley, Vitter, Mark Sanford, Robert "Bob" Allen, Larry Craig, just to name a few. Does this mean that you approve of their behavior? Or is that just another instance of your bias and ignorance coming through again? To even suggest that one party is more/less slimy than the other is laughable.

Wanna make a wager my furry little friend?

Ethics probes may saddle Democrats in 2010

and

Bad news for Democrats in revelation of ethics probes

Profiles of key congressmen named in report
Rep. Barton (R-Tex.)
Rep. Bishop (D-Ga.)
Rep. Christian-Christensen (D-Virgin Islands)
Rep. Dicks (D-Wash.)
Rep. Engel (D-N.Y.)

Rep. Graves (R-Mo.)
Rep. Harman (D-Calif.)
Rep. Jackson (D-Ill.)
Rep. Kaptur (D-Ohio)
Rep. Kilpatrick (D-Mich.)

Rep. Mack (R-Fla.)
Rep. Matsui (D-Calif.)
Rep. Miller (R-Calif.)
Rep. Moran (D-Va.)
Rep. Murtha (D-Pa.)
Rep. Payne (D-N.J)
Rep. Rangel (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Reyes (D-Tex.)
Rep. Richardson (D-Calif.)
Rep. Linda T. Sanchez (D-Calif.)
Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.)
Rep. Shuler (D-N.C.)
Rep. Stark (D-Calif.)

Rep. Tiahrt (R-Kan.)
Rep. Thompson (D-Miss.)
Rep. Towns (D-N.Y.)
Rep. Visclosky (D-Ind.)
Rep. Waters (D-Calif.)

Rep. Young (R-Fla.)
 
Sadly, but not surprisingly, some politicians have a reputation for for throwing their around and being rather obnoxious passengers. There have been stories about Sen Schumer for a long time. And didn't he say something about US deserving a "shellacking" a few years ago.

Other airlines have had to endure demanding politicians, too. Wasn't there a Congresswoman from Texas to who actually told by CO that there are other carriers that fly between TX and DC after the airline had enough of her antics?
 
Wanna make a wager my furry little friend?


Pardon me if I decide to wait for the results. BTW, if you read what you posted 2 of the probes cleared two of the members IIRC 1 dem and 1 rep. I know certain rights do not appeal to you but I like the idea of innocent till proven guilty.

I still stand by my statement, both parties stink. They both stink the same. They both only care about their own self interests. Neither care about the country or it's citizens. We have the government that we deserve.
 
Pardon me if I decide to wait for the results. BTW, if you read what you posted 2 of the probes cleared two of the members IIRC 1 dem and 1 rep. I know certain rights do not appeal to you but I like the idea of innocent till proven guilty.

I still stand by my statement, both parties stink. They both stink the same. They both only care about their own self interests. Neither care about the country or it's citizens. We have the government that we deserve.
And yet you still have the unflappable devotion to "hope and change"? Or you having a revelation (voters remorse)?
 
This just in from the "Hypocrissy Knows No Bounds" Department.

So now we have New York Senator Chuck "Amok" Schumer calling a F/A the "B" word. Has anyone not named Sparrow Hawk noticed that the AFA/CWA and the AFL-CIO is as silent as a statue?

Now do you think if Chuck "Amok" was oh say Newt Gingrich, do you really think this wouldn't be on talk shows and Sunday TV political shows.

This is typical of the same crap we saw in the Paula Jones case during the Clinton years. The N.O.W, crowd couldn't afford to offend the Clinton's and BLAM Paula Jones goes under the bus and worse she is taken to the woodshed by the media for daring to point out that the Emporer indeed had no clothes.

So much for the Democrats being the champion of the working man. I think the "little guy" has had about all the help they can stand. Wanna bet the F/A gets written up?
 
Chuck Schumer or any politician NEVER does anything that doesn't benefit him directly. While I've no doubt his call was of great comfort in your darkest hour, bet dollars to donuts it was a calculated move on his part.




Perhaps yes, perhaps no.
I'd much rather have it either way, than the unexplainable absence of former President Bush for being M I A at Dover AFB for years as our loved once came home for Good.
 
Always back to Bush ! :down:

I can hear 30 years from now........................."But it was Bush's fault !" :down:
 
Oh yes. It could most definitely be worse.

In 2010 as the economy is rebounding strongly, Fox news will be spinning how the economy would have been robust even if Palin were president.

Save this post for when Obama is giving his acceptance speech in 2012.

Nouriel Roubini says at best slow growth for 2010.

Screw the Palin spin......................DNC is running the economy and the country into bankruptcy............only a fool wouldn't see it.

Dow is moving along quite well as money people are cashing in before the tax changes come into effect Jan 1st..................so we have a false indication of a recovery due to Obama taxation changes. See what happens 1st quarter 2010 and get back to me Squire......

And as you say....It most definitely will get worse........
 

Latest posts

Back
Top