S C O T U S, Justice Ruth Ginsberg, passes away.

Did you miss me Bears? ......... Here you go! A little bet of common since on why that vacant seat should be filled!
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #20
There is a conservative movement for late term abortion.......very late term, like some 70 years after being born.....watch your donkey.


dell.

I'm not 'kool' with late term abortions, and never have been.
Having said that, KC Flyers last post, 2/3 before your post here, makes a lot of sense !


( 'Steel-Boys', lookin' good Brotha' )!
( I laughed my arse off when FIG Newton came up inches short, against SEA ) !
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #21
Nobody misses you. Your “bet of common since” flubs aside.


Dog' .

You-Know-Who :confused: o_O :confused: o_O :confused:, has to be the DUMBEST S O B that EVER was on here/the cooler', and that's taking into account a TON of Lame Brains that have been on here !

AND, lets not forget HIS Classic " EFECTION " YEAR, 2020 !
 
Last edited:
I don't worry about what you think...I worry about what Kansans for Life (who are a force in my state) think.
If you don't worry about what I think then why engage me? If you put no value on what I have to say then you are wasting both of our time.

And you listed four too many exceptions. They much prefer that we give the "you shoulda kept your legs together" speech to teach people to be more responsible with their sex.
I could care less if they approve of my exceptions. I don't speak for them I speak for me. Those are the conditions I feel comfortable funding the abortion.

Oh yeah...I would expect to see the number of abortions go up because you all defund Planned Parenthood because a lot of women who were having irresponsible sex were using birth control, but because you all literally threw the baby out with the bathwater, they will go and just have irresponsible sex.
First off your statement is ridiculous. Having someone else pay for YOUR anything does not encourage responsibility, in fact it usually has the opposite effect. Responsibility is a result of forethought and good decisions. Maybe one of these days you will learn that.

Second I have never met anyone in my entire life that is so broke they can't afford birth control (which is both varied and CHEAP). The fact you would even say that is both ridiculous and disingenuous.

Practice up on your speech because it's the speech usually given to a woman who has a child she can't affort out of wedlock. Maybe if you all were truly "pro life" I might come around to your views....but you all are only "pro fetus"..once that precious baby is born, well...your mama shoulda kept her legs together because I don't want MY tax dollars to pay for her irresponsible behaviour.
See you got it all wrong. If a woman wants to have 100 abortions that is on her, as long as SHE or her lover are paying for it. When she makes HER problem the tax payers problem (and therefore MY problem) that is when I take exception and I will be damned if I will tolerate some liberal socialist (you) telling me I have the privilege of funding it but no right to criticize it.

What right do YOU have to insist I accept the cost of someone else's decision?

You (or anyone else) don't get to insist I pay the price for other people's decisions then demand I remain silent. Not going to happen.
 
See you got it all wrong. If a woman wants to have 100 abortions that is on her, as long as SHE or her lover are paying for it. When she makes HER problem the tax payers problem (and therefore MY problem) that is when I take exception and I will be damned if I will tolerate some liberal socialist (you) telling me I have the privilege of funding it but no right to criticize it.

Hmmm...why defund planned parenthood and ban abortions - why not just change the Medicaid Rules so they don't pay for abortions. That's the only taxpayer money that they get for abortions. The rest of the money was NOT for abortions. But seems that to these pro fetus people that want to overturn Roe v Wade don't seem to be talking about federal money....it seems they don't want Jane Doe to get an abortion for any reason. Why would they do that instead of attacking the much easier to accomplish target of Medicaid payments.
 
Hmmm...why defund planned parenthood and ban abortions - why not just change the Medicaid Rules so they don't pay for abortions. That's the only taxpayer money that they get for abortions.
Funny how Planned Parenthood and the left denied that for years. My guess is the right simply does not trust them given their history of outright lies. They rather defund them than suffer further manipulation and lies.

The rest of the money was NOT for abortions. But seems that to these pro fetus people that want to overturn Roe v Wade don't seem to be talking about federal money....it seems they don't want Jane Doe to get an abortion for any reason.
Why are you telling me? I thought I made it very clear that my issues were monetary and based on my distaste of socialism/entitlement. I am not one of the "fetus people" whatever the hell that is.

Why would they do that instead of attacking the much easier to accomplish target of Medicaid payments.
Seems like a reasonable compromise to me, provided they refrain from lying (which they do with alarming frequency) and fraud (which is just another form of lying so I would not put it past them).
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top