(Previous) TWU/513 President- Mark Nelson

[eolesen]

Timeline may be off but sounds like you admit The Goose is right, the Voice of Reason has as much of a chance at AA HDQ as a snowball in hell.

No, the Voice of "Double Your Paycheck" spoke, and I listened. And I don't regret that one bit. Especially the part where my family's stability depends on whatever some dumba$$ union thinks.

 

[The Goose]

No, the Voice of "Double Your Paycheck" spoke, and I listened. And I don't regret that one bit. Especially the part where my family's stability depends on whatever some dumba$$ union thinks.

I certainly didn't mean to imply you were shown the door; rather, it's understood you found better compensation for your particular occupation and had had enough of the corporate horse poo.

BTW - in your statement re: "dumbass union" - the word "union" should be plural and in quotes to signify the lack of integrity in said "unions'" upper ranks.

 

[Bob Owens]

No, the Voice of "Double Your Paycheck" spoke, and I listened. And I don't regret that one bit. Especially the part where my family's stability depends on whatever some dumba$$ union thinks.

I suppose thats why you spend so much time here. I would think that if there were no regrets you would find other things to do with your time other than debating things with the employees of your ex-employer.

 

[eolesen]

Trust me, no regrets whatsoever, Bob.

This is little more than a hobby now, and an enjoyable one at that. I can call things for what they are and not have to worry some trumped up Rule 32 charge or someone whining to HR about someone in management being mean to AMFA zealots...

 

[MCI transplant]

Trust me, no regrets whatsoever, Bob.

This is little more than a hobby now, and an enjoyable one at that. I can call things for what they are and not have to worry some trumped up Rule 32 charge or someone whining to HR about someone in management being mean to AMFA zealots...

<_< ------- Haven't you heard? Rule 32 is dead! Ever since Our-Pay ignored the Letter from our favorite Union VP from AFW, to the President's of TUL, and MCI, which were made public, any further thought of enforcing that rule would be the hight of hypocrisy!!!

 

[The Goose]

<_< ------- Haven't you heard? Rule 32 is dead! Ever since Our-Pay ignored the Letter from our favorite Union VP from AFW, to the President's of TUL, and MCI, any further thought of enforcing that rule would be the hight of hypocrisy!!!

Hypocrisy has everything to do with how AA management does business. For them, it's standard operating procedure.

 

[eolesen]

<_< ------- Haven't you heard? Rule 32 is dead! Ever since Our-Pay ignored the Letter from our favorite Union VP from AFW, to the President's of TUL, and MCI, which were made public, any further thought of enforcing that rule would be the hight of hypocrisy!!!

While you probably don't see it because management doesn't air their dirty laundry in public to the extent the unions like to, management is held to a higher standard by HR.

Stepping into the middle of a pissing match between union officials isn't what Rule 32 was intended to cover, but I don't doubt for a moment that if a similar exchange were to take place between a management employee and a subordinate or non-manageement employee that Rule 32 would be invoked. And it doesn't even need to be a rule for a member of management to end up with a "letter of concern" which is the equivilent of a second or third step advisory for everyone below L5.