Dont call me Shirley
Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2002
- Messages
- 3,270
- Reaction score
- 306
I have not any speculation about post merger policy for UMs or live animal in the cargo hold (AVIH).
HP brought its policies for the to post merger: UMs on nonstops only and cabin pets being the only live animals accepted. Both in line with being a "low cost carrier".
UAL just announced that it will no longer accept UMs on connections:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/19/united-unaccompanied-mino_n_4474978.html
CHICAGO (AP) — Hey, kids! United Airlines says children flying alone need to go nonstop or stay home.
United says it's no longer allowing children ages 5 to 11 to fly without an adult on flights that include connections. It also says its optional service for unaccompanied minors ages 12-17 will only be offered on nonstop flights.
I wonder if UAL's decision will influence post merger AA policy. UMs on connection involve a great deal of staff time and carry the potential for things to go wrong. I can see why a carrier, low cost or full service, would decide that it is just not worth it.
Live animals in the hold also involve extra work and things can go wrong there as well. But there is also a large demand to transport critters, both as baggage and cargo. And a lot of revenue at $100 plus each.
HP brought its policies for the to post merger: UMs on nonstops only and cabin pets being the only live animals accepted. Both in line with being a "low cost carrier".
UAL just announced that it will no longer accept UMs on connections:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/19/united-unaccompanied-mino_n_4474978.html
CHICAGO (AP) — Hey, kids! United Airlines says children flying alone need to go nonstop or stay home.
United says it's no longer allowing children ages 5 to 11 to fly without an adult on flights that include connections. It also says its optional service for unaccompanied minors ages 12-17 will only be offered on nonstop flights.
I wonder if UAL's decision will influence post merger AA policy. UMs on connection involve a great deal of staff time and carry the potential for things to go wrong. I can see why a carrier, low cost or full service, would decide that it is just not worth it.
Live animals in the hold also involve extra work and things can go wrong there as well. But there is also a large demand to transport critters, both as baggage and cargo. And a lot of revenue at $100 plus each.