Following are changes sought by the airline.
• Methodically tackling the long list of lingering computer bugs.
• Hiring 30 temporary customer-service employees to resolve a backlog of complaints.
• Resurrecting a program to get hundreds of early-morning flights, called "launch flights," out on time to lessen the ripple effects early flight delays and cancellations cause.
• Continuing to throw resources into its troubled Philadelphia hub, where flight delays and baggage handling remain big problems despite some progress.
• Hiring, as a pre-emptive move, extra airport customer service workers for the summer, primarily on the East Coast.
• Spreading out its summer flight schedule, especially at its Philadelphia and Charlotte, N.C., hubs, so there is more wiggle room in case of delays. Fewer flights will be scheduled during peak times.
• Upgrading its inflight service, from food and training for flight attendants, to a "revolutionary" seat-back entertainment system. The first improvements will debut this summer; the entertainment system will begin a trial period early next year.
• Redesigning usairways.com, with a new site debuting next year.
"It is a big ship to turn, (and) it is turning, no question," Christ said. "We will absolutely get up from this."
---------------------------------------------
My opinion: (feel free to share yours, but please be respectful.. my point isn't to cause anyone to bicker about this.. either you like it or not)
Maybe the "New" US Airways system is just a step to get something operating. Our website? Mediocre but usually it does basic functions. Our reservations system? Bah, I'm QIK/SHARES trained so I never worked with anything else, but seems like they needed to get to one system.. and based on prior posts, Dougie said they may change software in the future. Why drag out the merger? Merge first and fix later seems to be the motto. Release software/sites that meet basic needs, move on to the next issue. Seems like they are doing this on purpose to try to get the airline merged as one platform, instead of two seperate identities. This being so they can improve the company as a hole and not having to neglect one side to bring the other side to similar specs.
I come from an IT background, so I know how hard a rollout can be. You have testing, planning, backup/alternate plans, production testing, etc to do before you commit. If you commit and it doesn't work, you've just probably destroyed the company and might as well kiss it goodbye.
IT plays a critical role in any business, and hopefully Dougie and management recognize this. Their subpar pay for even IT staff turns people away.
Anyhow, back to subject on hand.. I think this may be a step forward and may help destinguish us from other airlines in our category. It's a shame that we're trying to make US Airways, a decent carrier, into a southwest airlines. People call me up, ask what airline it will be on (DUH.. LOL) and dread when I say US Airways. I can hear it in their tone.
• Methodically tackling the long list of lingering computer bugs.
• Hiring 30 temporary customer-service employees to resolve a backlog of complaints.
• Resurrecting a program to get hundreds of early-morning flights, called "launch flights," out on time to lessen the ripple effects early flight delays and cancellations cause.
• Continuing to throw resources into its troubled Philadelphia hub, where flight delays and baggage handling remain big problems despite some progress.
• Hiring, as a pre-emptive move, extra airport customer service workers for the summer, primarily on the East Coast.
• Spreading out its summer flight schedule, especially at its Philadelphia and Charlotte, N.C., hubs, so there is more wiggle room in case of delays. Fewer flights will be scheduled during peak times.
• Upgrading its inflight service, from food and training for flight attendants, to a "revolutionary" seat-back entertainment system. The first improvements will debut this summer; the entertainment system will begin a trial period early next year.
• Redesigning usairways.com, with a new site debuting next year.
"It is a big ship to turn, (and) it is turning, no question," Christ said. "We will absolutely get up from this."
---------------------------------------------
My opinion: (feel free to share yours, but please be respectful.. my point isn't to cause anyone to bicker about this.. either you like it or not)
Maybe the "New" US Airways system is just a step to get something operating. Our website? Mediocre but usually it does basic functions. Our reservations system? Bah, I'm QIK/SHARES trained so I never worked with anything else, but seems like they needed to get to one system.. and based on prior posts, Dougie said they may change software in the future. Why drag out the merger? Merge first and fix later seems to be the motto. Release software/sites that meet basic needs, move on to the next issue. Seems like they are doing this on purpose to try to get the airline merged as one platform, instead of two seperate identities. This being so they can improve the company as a hole and not having to neglect one side to bring the other side to similar specs.
I come from an IT background, so I know how hard a rollout can be. You have testing, planning, backup/alternate plans, production testing, etc to do before you commit. If you commit and it doesn't work, you've just probably destroyed the company and might as well kiss it goodbye.
IT plays a critical role in any business, and hopefully Dougie and management recognize this. Their subpar pay for even IT staff turns people away.
Anyhow, back to subject on hand.. I think this may be a step forward and may help destinguish us from other airlines in our category. It's a shame that we're trying to make US Airways, a decent carrier, into a southwest airlines. People call me up, ask what airline it will be on (DUH.. LOL) and dread when I say US Airways. I can hear it in their tone.