Gilding the Lily
Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2006
- Messages
- 1,466
- Reaction score
- 2
In a recent interview, VP Candidate, Sarah Palin said she fears her First Amendment rights may be threatened by "attacks" from reporters who suggest she is engaging in a negative campaign against Barack Obama.
She said: "If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations, then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."
Hmmm. This is VERY odd. Essentially, Palin is saying that SHE wants to restrict the media from saying certain things about her so that she can get her point across. First, the 1st amendment is to protect the people from government abridging the freedom of speech; not the other way around. Second, as she is a government official (and running for VP), it is very disconcerting that she is trying to shut the media up (potentially limiting their 1st amendment rights) in the guise of protecting her freedom of speech rights.
I understand that the media shows bias and, in many cases, it is not favorable towards her or is too favorable towards Obama; but she needs to address that problem of media bias... not a pseudo first amendment problem that nearly points the finger directly back at her. This is showing a complete lack of understanding on the issue.
She said: "If [the media] convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning, for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations, then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media."
Hmmm. This is VERY odd. Essentially, Palin is saying that SHE wants to restrict the media from saying certain things about her so that she can get her point across. First, the 1st amendment is to protect the people from government abridging the freedom of speech; not the other way around. Second, as she is a government official (and running for VP), it is very disconcerting that she is trying to shut the media up (potentially limiting their 1st amendment rights) in the guise of protecting her freedom of speech rights.
I understand that the media shows bias and, in many cases, it is not favorable towards her or is too favorable towards Obama; but she needs to address that problem of media bias... not a pseudo first amendment problem that nearly points the finger directly back at her. This is showing a complete lack of understanding on the issue.