NW's cash is unacceptably low and heading lower

WorldTraveler

Corn Field
Dec 5, 2003
21,709
10,662
Northwest Airlines Corp., the fourth-largest U.S. carrier, may need a loan to help it through bankruptcy because it is running low on cash, one of the carrier's advisers said.

The financing will be necessary because Northwest's cash balance is already "at unacceptably low levels and is heading lower," Seabury Securities LLC Chief Executive Officer John Luth said in a filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York Tuesday.

Northwest's business plan doesn't show the Eagan, Minn.-based airline generating "significant" cash until 2009 or 2010, he said.

Northwest, unlike many companies in bankruptcy, did not arrange any loans to use while under Chapter 11 court protection. Most bankrupt companies get the loans to keep operations going while they try to reduce costs and stem losses. Northwest has had about $4 billion in losses since 2001.

"They need to raise capital," said Helane Becker, an analyst for Benchmark Co. in New York who does not have a rating on the company.

The company will also likely need at least $2 billion to exit bankruptcy, and as much as $7 billion later to update its aircraft fleet, Luth said. The $2 billion would be used partly to refinance any loans that the company gets during the bankruptcy, he said.

Northwest asked Luth to make the projections to help it gain court support for its attempt to secure $1.4 billion in employee wage and benefit cuts. Northwest last month reached interim agreements with its unions to save $446 million annually, and is still negotiating for the rest. The company has said it will seek court permission to void the contracts and impose new terms if no agreement is reached by mid-January.
 
While this is somewhat distressing news, it seems like NW shouldn't have much trouble attracting financing. Lots of assets and plenty of international flying in growth areas like Asia.
 
Hey, just add up the #s in the original post ($4bil + $2bil + $7bil = $13bil) and you're still better than DL with their $20bil in debt!

"Paging Leo Mullin, to the white courtesy phone please...."
 
AA would be more than happy to buy the pacific. They would bring the airplanes and the employees (of course, stapled), until things went sour, then layoff all the NW people.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Titan,
I think you missed the point that NW has no unencumbered assets to pledge as collateral which is why they don't have debtor in possession financing now. NW does have assets they can sell to raise cash but that is a very dangerous path to start down.
 
I am sure Airbus and Pratt has already paid some "financial analyst handsomely to determine NWA's financial state. Do you think they go into a billion dollar deal without first studying a bankrupt companies finances very critically? I guess you guys are better pretenders at being "financial analyst" than they are.
 
I am sure Airbus and Pratt has already paid some "financial analyst handsomely to determine NWA's financial state. Do you think they go into a billion dollar deal without first studying a bankrupt companies finances very critically? I guess you guys are better pretenders at being "financial analyst" than they are.


You might want to consider the fact that the first echelon of NWAs notorious leadership is now charged with insider trading and making false statements...ie; THEY LIED!

http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/051221/0104661.html
 
I said it before and I'll say it again, the scabs working the maintaince will be in for a rude awakening when mgmt tells them they are taking money and benes cuts. IT WILL HAPPEN. Just look at what USAIR mgmt did to us. But in the scabs case, they wont need a judge to terminate any part of the contract for maintaince
 
I said it before and I'll say it again, the scabs working the maintaince will be in for a rude awakening when mgmt tells them they are taking money and benes cuts. IT WILL HAPPEN. Just look at what USAIR mgmt did to us. But in the scabs case, they wont need a judge to terminate any part of the contract for maintaince
They will do to the maintenance folks what they did to the Fa folks. Give them the walking papers, a nice sent of luggage, and a flight home.Trusted Nwa before, and got burnt big time. Now working for another airline doing what I want to do albiet domestically. I do thanks them for the training which assisted immeasurably in passing the Fa training at the other airline. I fear that NWA will either go down the tubes, or swallowed by another airline(Delta, or US AIR). AS for the excutives getting their just punishment I fear in this administration climate of businness is always right,and screw the employee,take the bucks and bolt . It will not happen, the government is in collusion with a lot of big companies. Get out of there while the gettin is good.
 
AA would be more than happy to buy the pacific. They would bring the airplanes and the employees (of course, stapled), until things went sour, then layoff all the NW people.
<_< Now how would that work? Your not sugesting stapling them in under what's left of the exTWA employees are you???? :shock:
 
You might want to consider the fact that the first echelon of NWAs notorious leadership is now charged with insider trading and making false statements...ie; THEY LIED!

http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/051221/0104661.html
You might want to just stick to the facts. There has not been even the slightest suggestion that NWA falsified, or even strayed from GAAP in the least bit, in any of its SEC financial filings or current court filings. That is the information that creditors base their decisions on. The items you note are irrelevent (as well as highly speculative) in any decisions that Airbus or Pratt would make concerning debtor financing.
 
You might want to just stick to the facts. There has not been even the slightest suggestion that NWA falsified, or even strayed from GAAP in the least bit, in any of its SEC financial filings or current court filings. That is the information that creditors base their decisions on. The items you note are irrelevent (as well as highly speculative) in any decisions that Airbus or Pratt would make concerning debtor financing.


And prehaps you should learn to read. My post clearly stated they, the individuals of NWAs management team, had been "CHARGED" not that they were guilty.Do not attempt to put words in my mouth.

Also, the character(or lack there of) of executive management team is most definately something Airbus or Pratt or ANY DIP lender would look at when making a financing decision.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top