ThirdSeatHero
Veteran
""...The skepticism is understandable considering the IAMs history at UAL, but it is not the same IAM we would be returning to should a card drive prove successful...""
This is one statement we agree upon. There is only one teeny tiny difference. You believe they have improved. I have witnessed the downhill slide from good to poor performance.
Ez, I believe I've acknowledged the challenges based on the IAMs previous history with the Mechanics at UAL. This has been weighed and measured against our current representation, or more to the point, lack thereof under the IBT, and we have decided to try and effect change via a new Mechanics District with the IAM.
I noted you have faith in the IBTs ability to secure CAL Ramp a contract more expeditiously than the IAM. You might want to investigate the IBTs recent lack of progress at their flagship group UPS - Over FOUR years negotiating and no contract, Horizon pilots also over FOUR years and only just secured a TA, and the Mechanic Group here at UAL, where the IBT IGNORED mechanic contractual language to commence joint mediation with the company.