Jim,
I do not believe in having things remain how they are because they have always been that way. What I do believe is that regardless of how many changes you make there will still be the less desirable routes being flown by the most junior, and the least desirable paychecks will be cashed by the most junior.
And, I have no problem with flying those "less desirable" routes (though, in my situation, ANY line is better than no line, and in some months I can hold a really nice line) or the lesser paycheck. I have a sufficient income from my investments. That's what I meant by the 2000 situation does not affect me directly. However, I have a lot of friends that may not be able to afford this glamorous career with this new thing. The way they can afford reserve month is flying high time on the other 3 months. The 2000 series people will not have this opportunity.
You all keep posting, "Well, it's only going to affect about 200 people systemwide." Well, if that is half of AVBL lines, then doing away with AVBL would have put only 400 more people on reserve systemwide.
What's the big deal? These are people who are, at best, the most junior people on backup reserve during those months. So, for the summer months, a few of them would slip back to reserve instead of backup. This would affect
maybe 50 people at DFW or ORD, less at the other bases. Some of them were already having to serve reserve once a year in NOV or DEC. So, now they would serve reserve two times a year. Oh, the horror! How unfair!
As far as being on reserve, when I was at DFW, I looked forward to reserve months because I got trips on reserve that I would NEVER hold on a line month--24 hour NYC layovers, 3-day trips with 2 legs a day. (Ah, the good old days back in 2000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/362ab/362abad46b766ff547247dea806c82a39a09e5d0" alt="lol :lol: :lol:"
) I still don't mind reserve, because for me
it's part of the package, and always will be. But for 3 months per year per the contract. This is nothing more than THB and company finding a way to trash another contract provision, and put the most junior people on straight reserve without having to call it that or hold a vote on it.
For those of you who don't seem to care that every time they turn around the current APFA officers and BOD are circumventing the contract, as well as our own by-laws and Constitution, I hope you are not surprised when whole parts of the contract are declared null and void by some court. In labor law there is a principle called "practice of the shop." If the union allows or abets the company in violating the CBA, then the violation
has the force of law and the contractual wording is null and void.
But, then I'm only a junior flight attendant. I should just pay my dues and keep my mouth shut. I will fly for AA, at most, 5.5 more years (until I get my 10 years and lifetime travel benefits). A number of you are going to have to live with the actions of the current APFA administration for a long time. Enjoy!
The Great Jimoni will now make a prediction...
At the end of this "experiment" in September, regardless of any input from the people who get stuck with the 2000 series lines, the company and its pet union, APFA, will declare the experiment a smashing success, and it will be made permanent and year-round. No side letter will have to be signed because AVBL, per se, is not contractual, and since it will not be called reserve it will not be a violation of the contract.