767jetz & Cosmo:
I’m not against United Airlines or its employees and I only report what I have heard from knowlegable sources. I fully understand why you do not want to lose one single aircraft, one single job, and one single ASM and if I was in your shoes I would feel the same way.
The issue for United is the same for US Airways – a rapidly changing industry where RASM is being ratcheted down by LCC's. As I have said on countless occasions, I believe United will emerge from bankruptcy, but it may have to sell assets to emerge.
The company has been and continues to be in discussion with US Airways about the transfer of United assets into US Airways, which could be a means to make both companies survive. In addition to providing exit financing, a deal between RSA and United to shift assets to US Airways could cut United’s costs, improve US Airways revenue, and help United meet the ATSB requirement of a 7% profit margin in 7 years.
Meanwhile, I’m sure the ATSB and its consultants are watching closely the effects that LCC expansion will have on United’s loan guarantee application and revenue forecasts. This LCC problem is going to haunt both of our companies forever and either we collectively find a way to regain profitability, or both companies could fail.
If a deal occurs, it occurs and if it doesn’t, it doesn’t. My comments are not designed to inflame people and its not about me writing about potential corporate transaction that could help my "lot in life". It’s about two companies who are talking about a potential deal, which may or may not occur.
United is showing signs of progress, but five challenges reamin: the ACA/Dulles issue, EETC renegotiations, municipal bond litigation between the airline and the cities of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, Chicago, and Newark/New York, the underfunded pension, and exit financing.
Can these all be over come? I believe so, that's why I have said I believe the company will survive.
Regardless, here’s an interesting comparison between our two airlines:
United Airlines (UA)
UA’s third quarter net loss was $367 million
Break even load factor – 89.2%
Actual passenger load factor – 76.3% (up 4.8 points year-over-year)
RASM – 8.83 cents (up 95 cents year-over year)
CASM – 9.88 cents (down $1.02 cents year-over-year)
US Airways (US)
US’s third quarter net loss was $90 million, which included a non-cash charge of $24 million for the employee stock distribution plan
Break even load factor – not reported
Actual passenger load factor – 73.5% (up 1.5 points year-over-year)
RASM – 10.56 cents (up 76 cents year-over-year)
CASM – 10.98 cents (down $1.01 year-over-year)
Chip comments: The US – UA operating statistics indicate both companies cut their expenses by about $1.00 per ASM. US maintained a RASM premium of 68 cents over UA, while UA had a higher load factor than US by 2.8 points. UA reported a break even load factor of 89.2%, however, US did not report this statistic.
Regards,
Chip