MORE DEMORAT LIES...........

[delldude]

You haven't read the Obama tax plan then. You can read about it at the Tax Policy Center...where they break it down in detail. Yep...he'd let them expire on folks making over $250,000 per year. People making under $112,000 per year would see their taxes decline further.

You know...they all use the code word 'families'....screw the single guy.... :down:

 

[KCFlyer]

You know...they all use the code word 'families'....screw the single guy.... :down:

And the Republican plan is any different? I paid some pretty hefty taxes compared to my married brethren last year.

 

[KCFlyer]

I paid nearly 10K in taxes last year or put another way a dollar figure roughly the same as the payment for my Audi TT Roadster. So no Federal Income Tax is like getting a new car free!!! Now then ponder what all of that cash in circulation would do for the economy?

Well Bob...without those federal taxes, there would be no federal funding for improvements to the interstate highway system. So a lot of that extra cash would go to tire stores and Audi dealers, rebuilding the suspension on your TT.

 

[delldude]

And the Republican plan is any different? I paid some pretty hefty taxes compared to my married brethren last year.

Key word is all KC.

New government tax czar....Ben Dover.

 

[Dignity]

We have fared ok down here in the country of oil wealth. I haven't seen much of it, but the housing industry is not suffering down here as much as anywhere else due to that.

more jobs were "chased" out due to ultra low wages elsewhere. No amount of union bending over would stop that ( I know, I didn't bend over and still got it rammed home)...and those jobs leaving had nothing to do with environmental regulation. Remember, we have been under the watchful eye of oilmen for 8 years.

one reason is called NAFTA. even though former president bush signed it, congress had not yet officially put their stamp of approval on it...when clinton took office he used almost all of his political clout to get nafta pushed through..when it took effect in january 1994 corporations already had their plans to move factories to mexico before the ink was even dry...while it did protect the environment and associated concerns raised by democrats the problem was they misrepresented the real effects of trade and the economy regarding both creating and ...destroying... jobs. if they export less and import more goods the long term effect is lost jobs..why clinton pushed that through without thinking long term is beyond me...to protect the environment yet at the same time justifying that protection by building factories just across the border doesn't necessarily protect the environment at all..from the time it was passed in 1994 to mid 2000s while there have been many jobs created I believe it was 800 thousand in that time period, nearly 2 million jobs have been lost, that would be a total loss of over a million plus jobs lost. I believe it was Texas... California, Ohio and New York lost the most jobs in that time frame.

 

[Dignity]

You haven't read the Obama tax plan then. You can read about it at the Tax Policy Center...where they break it down in detail. Yep...he'd let them expire on folks making over $250,000 per year. People making under $112,000 per year would see their taxes decline further.

with the spending proposals proposed it wont work, after the bail out no one is getting a tax cut.

 

[Dignity]

without those federal taxes, there would be no federal funding for improvements to the interstate highway system.

interestingly enough washington is shifting more of that responsibility back to the states(or more of the burden) for what has been a federal highway subsidized program and supported by the democrat controlled congress...federal funds for highways are drying up as the gas tax has not increased in over 14 years..

 

[delldude]

Vote!

 

[North by Northwest]

If you take away all of the pork barrel items, the social safety net, corporate welfare, student loans etc. you end up with about 1/3 of the Federal Budget.

So the Federal Income tax has NOTHING to do with highways. It is used to reward supporters of the party currently in power. Democrats favor more social spending because the folks that vote for them work in that business to a greater percentage. Don't delude yourself into thinking they actually give a crap. Reverse for Republicans. Their core is large international corporations & the religious right so social spending decreases, defense work goes up and more laws are written to protect their friends from lawsuits. Don't get swept up in the international corporate conspiracy crap either. It's about rewarding friends and punishing foes at the expense of those of us who actually work for a living.

The secondary point is that if the Federal Government stuck to its original role as defined by the Constitution we wouldn't NEED a Federal Income Tax. So continue to grab your ankles every April 15th and smile and wave to all of the other sheeple.

I would just say this:

I would rather spend a Trillion at home, on Social programs (THAT'S a good thing in my book, the American public earned it/ it is their tax dollars, therefore it should be spent at home...just like people spend your paycheck for their benefit and home vs. Haliburton or JP Morgan)

Unlike spending a Trillion aboard and placing the nation five times deeper in a hole while the populace gets poorer and poorer. The standard of living for the US should be the highest in the world.

International corporations OWN this Presidency...just like the FAKE Federal Reserve. The American people mean nothing but a working set of slaves to be used and given a little of the pie as possible. Does anyone on here really believe that this housing bubble was because of Bush and the Banks trying to put Americans in their own homes?

It was because of a Ponzi Scheme set of for the profit of TRILLIONS world wide...only problem was Ponzi Schemes don't work. The few at the Top make the doe and run, leaving the Scheme to collapse.