Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
700UW said:No they wont fliboi, the IAM believes in helping its members not throwing the junior guys under the bus.
[post="228540"][/post]
CaptianBoomer said:All:
Read the code a phone. The U pilots are turning their backs on the furloughed guys! No to the furlough insurance plan!
I am furloughed U and have never had to use the "plan", however it was quite comforting to know it was there if I ever needed it.
Disgusted is too tame a word!
Boomer
[post="228186"][/post]
UseYourHead said:CaptainBoomer and all,
I voted to continue the funding and I too am disappointed.
I do have a question: Does the IAM, CWA, AFA, or any other entity cover medical for furloughed employees?
Just wondering....
[post="229104"][/post]
firstamendment said:UYH
The f/a's do not. Between the 28% worth of cuts straight across, and the 60-70% cut reserves have taken...thanks to concessionsII, we do not have that kind of extra cash. You must remember that MANY of our reserves. many who have 12-15 years senority, will be lucky if they make 20K this year. We have over 5000 involuntary and voluntary furloughs. That would be too much hardship.
[post="229110"][/post]
700UW said:And your remark about taking a paycut bigger then what most people earn is proof enough and sounds arrogant to me.
[post="229121"][/post]
RowUnderDCA said:This is what I mean by non sensical. I have no idea what 'auto pilot' has to do with labor markets.
[post="229152"][/post]
RowUnderDCA said:Savy-
I certainly agree withyour point about the regressively painful effect of % pay cuts.
[post="229176"][/post]