Furloughedagain
Senior
I guess that is where you and I differ MrPlane. You want me to quit whining and get a "real" job. I want you to start acting like a union member.
I believe that saving ONE job would be a victory. Saving even ONE job would mean that the pilot group did SOMETHING in the name of brotherhood.
The fact is that a few furloughees (who also happen to be MDA instructors) saw good ol' Mike Tosi at dinner a few nights ago -- Tosi didn't even want to speak to them.
I suppose if that is all we can expect from the union leadership, then why expect any more from the rank and file?
Me? I believe that a 75 hour cap might have saved some jobs -- perhaps the jobs of people who have been members of the US Airways family for 10-15 years. Wouldn't have saved MY job -- but it sure as heck would've been the right thing for a UNION to do.
I don't expect you to understand. It's probably been years since you saw a paycheck that was less than 85 hours. How high is your negative bank up to?
I believe that saving ONE job would be a victory. Saving even ONE job would mean that the pilot group did SOMETHING in the name of brotherhood.
The fact is that a few furloughees (who also happen to be MDA instructors) saw good ol' Mike Tosi at dinner a few nights ago -- Tosi didn't even want to speak to them.
I suppose if that is all we can expect from the union leadership, then why expect any more from the rank and file?
Me? I believe that a 75 hour cap might have saved some jobs -- perhaps the jobs of people who have been members of the US Airways family for 10-15 years. Wouldn't have saved MY job -- but it sure as heck would've been the right thing for a UNION to do.
I don't expect you to understand. It's probably been years since you saw a paycheck that was less than 85 hours. How high is your negative bank up to?