Machinists Update
- Thread starter 700UW
- Start date
- Status
I wonder if it was because that post had a de-evolution from being a vaild discussion of issues and presentation of information... Into a flame fest with such winning quips such as
Or it could be the simple name calling by certain people with terms of endearment such as "pathetic", or "fool" that were being tossed around needlessly... <_<
Moderator placed a sticky at the top of the forum, suggest one and all give it a read.
Peace B)
wings396
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 3,672
- 1,122
Why is an MDA F/O Trainee so quick to jump on the IAM and it's Membership???
You are not a member, and are not affected by the CBA and it's violations by the Company. Isn't there an ALPA website that you can pound your chest on already?
You are marching to the same tune as Mr. 320 on these boards. Maybe someday you can take over for him. Your concerns are not the same as the IAM or the CWA memberships are.
You are not a member, and are not affected by the CBA and it's violations by the Company. Isn't there an ALPA website that you can pound your chest on already?
You are marching to the same tune as Mr. 320 on these boards. Maybe someday you can take over for him. Your concerns are not the same as the IAM or the CWA memberships are.
1. I am not a trainee
2. In no way shape or form did my last post refer to the IAM. The post 700UW asked about being locked had to do with the IAM, this does not.
3. 700UW asked a question, I answered that question. If actually desired a answer instead of making a statement, he could have asked the moderator in a PM.
4. Said post was rife with examples of name calling, and poor conduct. I referred him to the sticky post at the top for the moderators position on such.
There has been too much of a tendancy for people to attack, esp in mob fashion anyone that forwards a viewpoint they disagree with.
I am not right, A320 is not right, you too are not "Right". This is simply a discussion forum meant to express opinions upon, and talk about events related to US Airways.
My opinion is just that.
I am entitled to it, just as you are entitled to your own. I may disagree with you, but I will not call you names or wish ill events upon you.
The purpose of this forum is to make people think, not toss abuse at one another.
2. In no way shape or form did my last post refer to the IAM. The post 700UW asked about being locked had to do with the IAM, this does not.
3. 700UW asked a question, I answered that question. If actually desired a answer instead of making a statement, he could have asked the moderator in a PM.
4. Said post was rife with examples of name calling, and poor conduct. I referred him to the sticky post at the top for the moderators position on such.
There has been too much of a tendancy for people to attack, esp in mob fashion anyone that forwards a viewpoint they disagree with.
I am not right, A320 is not right, you too are not "Right". This is simply a discussion forum meant to express opinions upon, and talk about events related to US Airways.
My opinion is just that.
I am entitled to it, just as you are entitled to your own. I may disagree with you, but I will not call you names or wish ill events upon you.
The purpose of this forum is to make people think, not toss abuse at one another.
BillLumbergh
Veteran
Agree with Rico. The other thread was nothing but the usual cesspool of IAM v. everybody, 700 v. 320, and malcontents v. ??? garbage.
- Status
