Light Years
Veteran
- Aug 27, 2002
- 2,878
- 0
Apparently the Republic deal is still an option that would be voted on by the new US Airways. I thought I heard them say they did not want to sell any slots, which was part of that transaction. Will the HP-run US still want to contract out the 170/190 flying? The unions should be very concerned with this because retaining that flying would prevent possible furloughs. Seeing as that aircraft family will likely replace most if not all 737 flying done by both carriers, it would likely be a significant part of the system.
And not a single mention of the wholly-owneds, or Express or RJs at all, which they are normally obsessed with. Clearly AirWisc will be significant and likely replace the current Mesa USX flying. US also has the ability in BK to end it's agreements with other contract carriers. Is HP-US interested in having owned Express carriers and divisions (multiple ones)? Or will AirWisc purchasing Piedmont and PSA, and be the single provider for US like ExpressJet is for CO?
Any thoughts or speculation?
Also, do the unions negotiate new contracts or pick one for the eventual combined operation? Will AFA from both carriers work together for a new agreement, or does one contract override the other?
And not a single mention of the wholly-owneds, or Express or RJs at all, which they are normally obsessed with. Clearly AirWisc will be significant and likely replace the current Mesa USX flying. US also has the ability in BK to end it's agreements with other contract carriers. Is HP-US interested in having owned Express carriers and divisions (multiple ones)? Or will AirWisc purchasing Piedmont and PSA, and be the single provider for US like ExpressJet is for CO?
Any thoughts or speculation?
Also, do the unions negotiate new contracts or pick one for the eventual combined operation? Will AFA from both carriers work together for a new agreement, or does one contract override the other?