jimntx said:
Well, I'm certainly hoping that the LCC unions have the backbone to stand firm. From what I have seen in my vast career of 12 years at AA, the TWU and the APFA are only expert in rolling over and playing dead, then after a conciliatory contract is "the best we could do", the union officers vote themselves a pay raise so that they are not affected by the cuts in pay and benefits for the rest of us.
Examining the AFA-CWA's track record at US, I wouldn't get very excited if I were you. It took them several years to get a contract, (seven, I believe) during which time they worked under the worst contract in the industry. That's a really long time to endure. And AFA's record at other carriers isn't much better.
For example, when AFA was elected the bargaining representative at F9, the leadership simply rubber stamped the work rules that they had always operated under, rather than try to negotiate for any improvements-- leaving many wondering what they were paying dues for.
At the former Midwest Express, you can see how successful AFA was in trying to preserve their careers at Republic or F9, which was not very.
Lots of former CO flight attendants are not excited about the prospect of having AFA as their new representative.
Delta flight attendants decided that they would rather have no union at all than AFA-CWA.
I know APFA isn't perfect, but I wonder if you aren't giving them enough credit. There's quite a bit of history that you should make you proud of your union and its accomplishments. Even some of the low points, such as the raw deal that was given to the former TWA stews, you gotta admit, was as much about the APFA being strong as it was about the IAM being weak.