Knockout Game

There are no such thing as wrongly "arrested" criminals. You are one of those typical libtards that have been corrupted by the liberal agenda and socialist schools.
 
Read the story about the hate crime case this morning.
 
Question:   If I am not mistaken the African American kids arrested for hitting the Caucasian victims were charged with assault correct?
 
Why is the Caucasian that was arrested for hitting an African American charged with a hate crime?
 
Don't get me wrong,  both deserve to be punished,  just wanting to know why the difference in charges?
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
There are no such thing as wrongly "arrested" criminals. You are one of those typical libtards that have been corrupted by the liberal agenda and socialist schools.
 
Never been in the joint, eh?
 
Everyone there 'wrongly' arrested.
 
Keroseneuser said:
Just wait till one of the victims of this game whips out a concealed carry weapon and removes a "gamer" from this world.  
 
Till then you wont hear much about it.
 
Won't happen if one uses the "Five-Point-Palm Exploding-Heart-Technique"
 
Keroseneuser said:
Read the story about the hate crime case this morning.
 
Question:   If I am not mistaken the African American kids arrested for hitting the Caucasian victims were charged with assault correct?
 
Why is the Caucasian that was arrested for hitting an African American charged with a hate crime?
 
Don't get me wrong,  both deserve to be punished,  just wanting to know why the difference in charges?
The reason they gave was:

"Investigators retrieved other videos from Barrett's phone, including some in which he uses racial epithets and talks about trying to work up the courage to play the knockout game, the complaint states. In one, Barrett says: "That plan is to see if I were to hit a black person, would this be nationally televised?"

I am not sure if that will stick if he gets a decent attorney. Sounds like a premeditated aggravated assault charge to me (by a dumb ass who tapes it and shows it to others as a trophy). He is probably one of those corrupted by the liberal agenda also.
 
Keroseneuser said:
Read the story about the hate crime case this morning.
 
Question:   If I am not mistaken the African American kids arrested for hitting the Caucasian victims were charged with assault correct?
 
Why is the Caucasian that was arrested for hitting an African American charged with a hate crime?
 
Don't get me wrong,  both deserve to be punished,  just wanting to know why the difference in charges?
I believe there is evidence of things that he said that were racist in nature in relation to this attack.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
The reason they gave was:

"Investigators retrieved other videos from Barrett's phone, including some in which he uses racial epithets and talks about trying to work up the courage to play the knockout game, the complaint states. In one, Barrett says: "That plan is to see if I were to hit a black person, would this be nationally televised?"

I am not sure if that will stick if he gets a decent attorney. Sounds like a premeditated aggravated assault charge to me (by a dumb ass who tapes it and shows it to others as a trophy). He is probably one of those corrupted by the liberal agenda also.
 
Sure he isn't a TP diehard?
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
The reason they gave was:

"Investigators retrieved other videos from Barrett's phone, including some in which he uses racial epithets and talks about trying to work up the courage to play the knockout game, the complaint states. In one, Barrett says: "That plan is to see if I were to hit a black person, would this be nationally televised?"

I am not sure if that will stick if he gets a decent attorney. Sounds like a premeditated aggravated assault charge to me (by a dumb ass who tapes it and shows it to others as a trophy). He is probably one of those corrupted by the liberal agenda also.
IMHO, Spot on!
Notice none of these cowards try to 'knockout' someone in great shape, just seniors, small/petite people, anyone that might appear vulnerable.
They should 'ALL' be convicted of a hate crime as they hate people!
Put them away for a long time.
B) xUT
 
Ms Tree said:
Inocent? Surely you jest. There are no inocents in jail. They are all guilty of something.
 
Q. How many innocent people are there in prison?
A. We will never know for sure, but the few studies that have been done estimate that between 2.3% and 5% of all prisoners in the U.S. are innocent (for context, if just 1% of all prisoners are innocent, that would mean that more than 20,000 innocent people are in prison).

More broadly, we know that innocent people are often identified as suspects by law enforcement and that DNA testing often clears them before they go to trial, but that DNA testing is impossible in the vast majority of criminal cases. In approximately 25% of cases where DNA testing was done by the FBI during the course of investigations, suspects were excluded by the testing. That doesn’t mean we believe 25% of convictions are in error, but when coupled with the fact that DNA testing is only possible in 5-10% of all criminal cases, it shows that science cannot always clear innocent suspects, which can result in wrongful convictions.
 
xUT said:
IMHO, Spot on!
Notice none of these cowards try to 'knockout' someone in great shape, just seniors, small/petite people, anyone that might appear vulnerable.
They should 'ALL' be convicted of a hate crime as they hate people!
Put them away for a long time.
B) xUT
 
Is hate protected by the Constitution?
 
Aren't hate crimes already existing crimes with progressive tinsel on them?
 
delldude said:
 
Is hate protected by the Constitution?
 
Aren't hate crimes already existing crimes with progressive tinsel on them?
No,
Good point!
But we don't make the laws, just have to survive under them.
Thugs have more rights than victims.
Been that way for 20+/- years.
If you have the scratch, commit a crime and your home on probation while the dregs of society do hard time.
Dems the facts Jack... :p
 
xUT said:
No,
Good point!
But we don't make the laws, just have to survive under them.
Thugs have more rights than victims.
Been that way for 20+/- years.
If you have the scratch, commit a crime and your home on probation while the dregs of society do hard time.
Dems the facts Jack... :p
 
I think hate is no more or less a form of self expression than burning the flag which is protected under the first.
 
delldude said:
 
Is hate protected by the Constitution?
 
Aren't hate crimes already existing crimes with progressive tinsel on them?
Nice touch, Dell ! "Progressive Tinsel" ! See more and more of it, every day!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top