Iran's supreme leader bans negotiations with the United States

Hatu said:
Let the carpet bombing begin (or at least four missiles):

U.S. officials say Russian missiles heading for Syria landed in Iran.

Monitoring by U.S. military and intelligence assets has concluded that at least four missiles crashed as they flew over Iran.

The U.S. believes, based on intelligence reports of damage assessments, that some buildings were damaged and civilians may have been hurt.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/08/politics/russian-missiles-syria-landed-iran/index.html
 
Heard that failure rate isn't uncommon.
 
Petey

Just to keep it short, and simple enough for even you

You make two posts above, containing seven statements of " fact "

None of them are accurate, or correct, or even nearly so

Zero, nil, zilch, nada

0 for 7 really ain't all that good
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #18
Ifly2 said:
Petey

Just to keep it short, and simple enough for even you

You make two posts above, containing seven statements of " fact "

None of them are accurate, or correct, or even nearly so

Zero, nil, zilch, nada

0 for 7 really ain't all that good
 
Hammana hammana hammana
 
You should tell us again how good that Iran deal is snowflake.
 
lol
 
Ifly2 said:
Petey

Just to keep it short, and simple enough for even you

You make two posts above, containing seven statements of " fact "

None of them are accurate, or correct, or even nearly so

Zero, nil, zilch, nada

0 for 7 really ain't all that good
For him its better than his usual 0 for 10.
 
We'll see how good it is

I haven't said it was, or even made any predictions, so there is no "again"

I have noted that Benji told Congress that Iran would have a nuc by now, and they don't.

Further, Benji's story has changed from Iran having a nuc by now to them having one in ten years

Looks like O did better than Benji, so far...
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #21
Ifly2 said:
We'll see how good it is

I haven't said it was, or even made any predictions, so there is no "again"

I have noted that Benji told Congress that Iran would have a nuc by now, and they don't.

Further, Benji's story has changed from Iran having a nuc by now to them having one in ten years

Looks like O did better than Benji, so far...
 
Well see how good it is?
 
Arent paying attention are we?
 
Its this good:
 

Iran's supreme leader bans negotiations with the United States
 
Please explain how that is "good" lol
 
The negotiations are over, remember?

So the Ayotollah placates his hard-liners saying stupid ****

Intrigue and double-dealing are embedded in their culture, as politicians flat out lying is in ours.
 
The link in the OP said that the ban pertained to "future" negotiations because the Iranians feel like they got screwed in the nuke talks.

As you stated, the nuke talks are concluded so the ban has no effect on that agreement. The fact that the ban is likely to be dropped once Iran discovers they need something is a separate issue.

Where the heck were all these hardliners when Reagan was giving the store away behind closed doors?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #24
Ifly2 said:
The negotiations are over, remember?

So the Ayotollah placates his hard-liners saying stupid ####

Intrigue and double-dealing are embedded in their culture, as politicians flat out lying is in ours.
 
Translation....
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKXjk3JexSg
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #25
Ms Tree said:
The link in the OP said that the ban pertained to "future" negotiations because the Iranians feel like they got screwed in the nuke talks.

As you stated, the nuke talks are concluded so the ban has no effect on that agreement. The fact that the ban is likely to be dropped once Iran discovers they need something is a separate issue.

Where the heck were all these hardliners when Reagan was giving the store away behind closed doors?
 
Despite what you "feel" you have no idea what you are talking about. But we are used to that.
 
Save yourself from further embarrassment and try reading the article for once.
 
townpete said:
Despite what you "feel" you have no idea what you are talking about. But we are used to that.
 
Save yourself from further embarrassment and try reading the article for once.
Talking about yourself I see.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #28
Hillary Clinton Accidentally Denounces Iran Deal
 
Now the real answer to this is for gun-owners to form a different organization that supports the Second Amendment, supports their rights to own guns, use guns, go hunting, go target shooting, but stands against the absolutism of the NRA. You know, the NRA’s position reminds me of negotiating with the Iranians or the communists. There’s no possible discussion. And it’s for political purposes.
 
Good ole Hillary, challenging Biden on who can gaffe the most.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top