Iran's supreme leader bans negotiations with the United States

Dog Wonder said:
Get one thread closed on Iran so you can open another one?
 
                                   
tJK2heV.gif

 
Trust me.....
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
So glad Obama was able to negotiate from a position of strength.
 
Or not.
 
So... Why does Iran have these Ayatollah dudes and why do we have to deal with them, any way?

What happened to the "US/Western Friendly" Shah, and his "regime"?

How did he get in the positin of ruling Iran/Persia to begin with?

Why, again, was that?

And, who was responsible?

Bonus Q: Who exactly started and nurtured Iran's nuclear program?

Extra Credit: What conditions and events actually really led to the taking of thenAmerican Hostages. Points off for any answer including the name of or allusions to President Carter.

That "storyline" is a pile of bogus bs.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
Ifly2 said:
So... Why does Iran have these Ayatollah dudes and why do we have to deal with them, any way?

What happened to the "US/Western Friendly" Shah, and his "regime"?

How did he get in the positin of ruling Iran/Persia to begin with?

Why, again, was that?

And, who was responsible?

Bonus Q: Who exactly started and nurtured Iran's nuclear program?

Extra Credit: What conditions and events actually really led to the taking of thenAmerican Hostages. Points off for any answer including the name of or allusions to President Carter.

That "storyline" is a pile of bogus bs.
 
Storyline is what it is.
 
Are you saying the Ayatollah really didnt say that?
 
Or are we going to re-hash history to avoid whats happening in the present day under a limp-d!ck president?
 
Your move.
 
Ifly2 said:
So... Why does Iran have these Ayatollah dudes and why do we have to deal with them, any way?

What happened to the "US/Western Friendly" Shah, and his "regime"?

How did he get in the positin of ruling Iran/Persia to begin with?

Why, again, was that?

And, who was responsible?

Bonus Q: Who exactly started and nurtured Iran's nuclear program?

Extra Credit: What conditions and events actually really led to the taking of thenAmerican Hostages. Points off for any answer including the name of or allusions to President Carter.

That "storyline" is a pile of bogus bs.
 
Totally different ME since the atoms for peace days.....even from the Shah's reign.
 
Apples and oranges now.
 
Another Neo Con failure

The GOP Nixon / Kissinger "smart guy" play fails miserably

Reagan not only negotiates with state sponsors of terrorism, but gives them weapons.

Bush 1 actually didn't do too bad, at least "did no (great...) harm". That's what ya' get when ya' elect statesmen with intelligence and experience.

Clinton pretty much didn't screw it up worse

Then we get numb nuts W and his Neo Con handlers, your heroes, who are still playing their tough guy and America gets to rule the world games in the media, while an intelligent but admittedly inexperienced president tries like hell to learn enough to mitigate the incredible damage the NeoCon morons have done.

And all you can come up with is "limp-dick"

You volunteering your own self and kids to be the boots on the ground, tough guy?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #10
Ifly2 said:
Another Neo Con failure

The GOP Nixon / Kissinger "smart guy" play fails miserably

Reagan not only negotiates with state sponsors of terrorism, but gives them weapons.

Bush 1 actually didn't do too bad, at least "did no (great...) harm". That's what ya' get when ya' elect statesmen with intelligence and experience.

Clinton pretty much didn't screw it up worse

Then we get numb nuts W and his Neo Con handlers, your heroes, who are still playing their tough guy and America gets to rule the world games in the media, while an intelligent but admittedly inexperienced president tries like hell to learn enough to mitigate the incredible damage the NeoCon morons have done.

And all you can come up with is "limp-dick"

You volunteering your own self and kids to be the boots on the ground, tough guy?
 
Hey buttercup, fyi: Your prez negotiated a deal with a partner who now says stuff it after the ink is dry.
 
And all you can say is hamana-hamana-hamana
 
lol
 
I will not cum in your mouth...
I did not have sex with that woman...
It will only hurt for a little while...
I don't remember...
I am not a crook...
No new taxes...
I was for it before I was against it...
...
...
Etc... :p
B) xUT
 
Hey,

He is your president every bit as much as he is mine

So what?

The Ayatollahs say all kinds of stuff, kinda' like our guys.

Watch what they do, and if we wind up carpet bombing them anyway, oh well, we tried
 
Let the carpet bombing begin (or at least four missiles):

U.S. officials say Russian missiles heading for Syria landed in Iran.

Monitoring by U.S. military and intelligence assets has concluded that at least four missiles crashed as they flew over Iran.

The U.S. believes, based on intelligence reports of damage assessments, that some buildings were damaged and civilians may have been hurt.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/08/politics/russian-missiles-syria-landed-iran/index.html
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #14
Ifly2 said:
Hey,

He is your president every bit as much as he is mine

So what?

The Ayatollahs say all kinds of stuff, kinda' like our guys.

Watch what they do, and if we wind up carpet bombing them anyway, oh well, we tried
 
Yeah, that type of foreign policy is was what got us 9/11. Clinton was to busy stuffing vag-cigars then taking out Bin Laden when he had the chance.
 
Because, oh well, we tried.
 
Right?
 
Pathetic.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #15
Only in a liberal world where you negotiate with a state sponsor of terrorism....
 
and you give them everything they want....
 
we ask for nothing and get nothing......
 
and then they tell you to get eff'd.....
 
and you think its a great deal!
 
lol  
 

Latest posts

Back
Top