Kev3188
Veteran
I think you just have to prove Trump's words/actions incited people to act. There's no shortage of those leading up to the rally.
Insurrection fueled by conspiracy groups, extremists and fringe movements
- Thread starter xUT
- Start date
I think you just have to prove Trump's words/actions incited people to act. There's no shortage of those leading up to the rally.
You, I and another hear His words, you and I don't act but the third does....explain that.
Kev3188
Veteran
Lack of critical thinking? A bad content diet? I'm sure there are dozens of possible reasons.
They acted on them and we didn't, but Trump's words still caused them to act.
They acted on them and we didn't, but Trump's words still caused them to act.
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 11,291
- 1,427
Words have power. Something that someone in such a high position should know. It's why most of the hated political types were very careful with what they said.
robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
Not on here compared to fb n w people outside work
robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
Trump would be included just as well given what his niece Mary Trump has publicly stated on talk show
No proof of that outside of left wing minds.
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 11,291
- 1,427
Okay I see your "no proof that Trump incited violence" and I raise you a "no proof the election wasn't rigged". Some people are having a helluva time accepting that last one.
robbedagain
Veteran
- Oct 13, 2003
- 11,125
- 2,676
Being in a state of denial apparently is a major deal to them. Not sure what part of Free and Fair Election they dont understand or the fact they are blind to see trump for who he is. Sad state to be in
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 11,291
- 1,427
That's not evidence of any voter fraud. It's evidence of a lot of allegations of voter fraud, but zero evidence of actual fraud. So again...I'll buy your "Trump never said attack the capitol" so long as you buy my "there is no evidence of voter fraud" Allegations - yes...just like people allege that Trump encouraged followers to attack the capitol. But proof - nope.
One other thing - The secretary of state in several states that Trump won did the exact same thing as these swing states did...making a change instead of the state legislature. But they weren't out to question the constitutionality of those elections.
Also...as for the shocking news of an election official directing them to count disputed ballots...It was in Antrim County, Michigan (population 23,000) - a county that Trump won by 61%
Last edited:
Best thing is to investigate the allegations and see where the evidence goes.
Changing the election law by SOS is unconstitutional in any state. Rand Paul claims he is going to make efforts in something like 22 states....that SOS changes were made.
Why would Biden or Trump object to a SOS circumventing the legislature in a state they clearly one.....Duh.
There is an excellent opinion by a federal judge regarding allegations of fraud in Michigan, where he said in his opinion, there wasn't time to investigate the evidence, even thought it is clear there is. It was on ScribD...I don't know if I can find it.....I may have posted it here somewhere.
KCFlyer
Veteran
- Aug 20, 2002
- 11,291
- 1,427
Again...the bombshell news about the elecion official telling people to count votes with the same signature was in a county of 23,000 and Trump won that county by 61%. Trump lost the state by a bit more than 154,000. Wouldn't it be a hoot if the investigation of the investigation of this Michigan counties found that the same signature voted for Trump (high likelihood).
Allegations are not evidence. I mean there were a lot of allegations that Russia an the Trump campaign were in cahoots in 2016. Does that mean they were correct?
It all starts with evidentiary hearings.
Trump Russia allegations were proven false due to an investigation of the allegations by Mueller...duh.
Rand Paul: Are They Going to Impeach Bernie Sanders for Inciting the Guy Who Shot Steve Scalise?
