Tim Nelson
Veteran
Fact:
On May 9th, 2006, the IAM and TWU reached an agreement over the future representation rights of the 'westies'. As part of the accord, the TWU withdrew.
TWU prez said, " I believe we have made the right decision for the members we represent at America West."
All of the above is public record.
At the time, many were miffed at how the TWU could bail out so easy on 2,000 members and give up alot of $ in dues. I myself decided to dig for monetary payments as a possible payoff to the TWU for its members. After a careful check of all filed reports at the DOL, I made a 'startling' discovery. The IAM, based on public records at the DOL, started donating 20,833 monthly to the TWU.
I'm not an attorney but IMO this represents a blatant DFR violation against the former TWU represented America West workers.
But don't take my opinion for it. Check out the public record of the IAM INTL LM2. It's 161 pages long and buried on page 118 in Schedule 17 is the 20,833 monthly payments to the TWU. Schedule 17 is the 'contributions and gifts' schedule, and the monetary 'givings' to the TWU is listed as "Donation". IAM Donations to the TWU started the month of June, one month after the TWU and IAM reached a 'deal'. The LM2 is for 2006 only and goes only to December. So it is very likely that when the 2007 LM2 comes out that the 'donations' may continue.
Again, I'm not an attorney but it seems to me that the westies should get an attorney and have this looked into for DFR violations. So far, IMO, the withdraw has screwed over any chance at section 6 openings for the westies and has possibly resulted in significant monetary damages. And it appears the TWU didn't lose out on any of this since it is getting the 'donations'.
Also, per public record, both the IAM and TWU agreed that part of the May 9th deal would involve "seniority". Such a deal, with compensation being paid, could result in DFR violations against East siders also. Many east siders wondered why the IAM would voluntarily give away a 'huge chunk' of the east siders profit sharing. I think it is reasonable to see 'how deep this rabbit hole goes'. Certainly attorneys may have to be retained to look over the legalities of the unions actions. I myself plan on contacting "key" union watchdog sites to see if any IAM mebers were violated. National Right to Work, Center for..., etc.
Regards,
On May 9th, 2006, the IAM and TWU reached an agreement over the future representation rights of the 'westies'. As part of the accord, the TWU withdrew.
TWU prez said, " I believe we have made the right decision for the members we represent at America West."
All of the above is public record.
At the time, many were miffed at how the TWU could bail out so easy on 2,000 members and give up alot of $ in dues. I myself decided to dig for monetary payments as a possible payoff to the TWU for its members. After a careful check of all filed reports at the DOL, I made a 'startling' discovery. The IAM, based on public records at the DOL, started donating 20,833 monthly to the TWU.
I'm not an attorney but IMO this represents a blatant DFR violation against the former TWU represented America West workers.
But don't take my opinion for it. Check out the public record of the IAM INTL LM2. It's 161 pages long and buried on page 118 in Schedule 17 is the 20,833 monthly payments to the TWU. Schedule 17 is the 'contributions and gifts' schedule, and the monetary 'givings' to the TWU is listed as "Donation". IAM Donations to the TWU started the month of June, one month after the TWU and IAM reached a 'deal'. The LM2 is for 2006 only and goes only to December. So it is very likely that when the 2007 LM2 comes out that the 'donations' may continue.
Again, I'm not an attorney but it seems to me that the westies should get an attorney and have this looked into for DFR violations. So far, IMO, the withdraw has screwed over any chance at section 6 openings for the westies and has possibly resulted in significant monetary damages. And it appears the TWU didn't lose out on any of this since it is getting the 'donations'.
Also, per public record, both the IAM and TWU agreed that part of the May 9th deal would involve "seniority". Such a deal, with compensation being paid, could result in DFR violations against East siders also. Many east siders wondered why the IAM would voluntarily give away a 'huge chunk' of the east siders profit sharing. I think it is reasonable to see 'how deep this rabbit hole goes'. Certainly attorneys may have to be retained to look over the legalities of the unions actions. I myself plan on contacting "key" union watchdog sites to see if any IAM mebers were violated. National Right to Work, Center for..., etc.
Regards,