Your contagious logic that has already befallen a vast majority of the unionized masses in the US.Why do so many quickly point out fault but then have not the time to administer a cure?
I wouldn't finally know the answer to that question Dell other than they are just reading the handwriting on the wall.
I myself was deeply involved in the IAM, went to every meeting and many conventions, representing about a 1,000 workers at the district level for one of the IAM's biggest locals. That's how I know the IAM and its structure is a ripoff and its futile to try to change its impotence, because of all the daylight I and others burned trying to 'fix it'. Not even a huge viagara pill could keep the IAM from its impotence in helping the working people of America.
I should have already known by reading its INTL constitution which gives exclusive powers to the INTL. IAM Locals are powerless as the IAM is extremely top heavy. I will say that it isn't entirely the constitutions fault since years ago the IAM was more useful in attempting to serve social justice.
When I didn't like what I saw, I tried to coordinate a competing officer ticket to get those I personally saw as 'leaches' out of office. I was successful in putting together a multi employer ticket that even included "Diehards" that would die for the IAM. But, in the end, the undemocratic system was a stonewall, and not surprisingly, the IAM even violated that [See DOJ and DOL suits].
My conclusion was that any time spent trying to 'fix this union' is a complete and utter waste. It's just the perfect storm of worker apathy and union boss unaccountability.
BTW, it is much harder to vote out an IAM Boss than it would be to just get rid of the whole union. Nonetheless, a taunting task indeed.
Hopefully, a delta merger would trigger a vote where I believe the great majority of workers will finally have the democratic opportunity to 'wash out' the IAM off US AIRWAYS property.
Just an opinion Dell. I will give your question some points though by saying it is a plausible question. I think most people are so damn busy today that they have little time to even consider their collective bargaining situation. Perhaps ironic.
Generally speaking, there is a huge cancer for unions called member apathy. Members want unions to entertain them but in the end, the opium has seemed to silence the masses anyways. The apathy has created an environment for the leaches to rise and multiply enough to pimp and corrupt the entire.
I think if one is to research the cultural phenomena that it will show an environment not condusive to unions or solidarity. A radical shift would have to take place within the American Labor movement to make unions more of an internalized and legitimate part of society. Such a shift, imo, would not occur at the top of the unions, they are already damned and I would think it impossible for the bloodsuckers to stop feeding.
At any rate,
regards