of course if DAL goes into BK first and UAIR can avoid it for several months one of the first things that happens as UAIR employees know is CUTS not only employees/wages but FLIGHTs very quickly things can change just as DAL predicated its recovery in part to the demise of U and would recover a certain percentage of thier customers thus increasing revenue. now the tables could be turned as DAL to has payments forthcoming. Should they reduce flights 20% those customers could travel on UAIR thus increasing gross revenues to a point that allows for something UAIR needs most MORE TIME. not to say this is a cure but ironic how DAL was hoping for the demise of U to save itself now the situation could be reversed.
i dont wish ill for any airline(s) employee (even if others did for UAIR) however perhaps there is yet another answer. instead of hammering out in short order permanent changes what about and intermim agreement to say satisfy requirements til say spring? with an automatic return to table? reason simply to reduce costs immediately to improve cash flow to a point where perhaps by the time you are obligated to return to the table REVs may have spiked due to DAL reductions (and lets not forget UAL probably has another 10% reduction before exit) ...
not the definitive answer but another thought from "outside the box" which apparently is where i wander alot
h34r:
i dont wish ill for any airline(s) employee (even if others did for UAIR) however perhaps there is yet another answer. instead of hammering out in short order permanent changes what about and intermim agreement to say satisfy requirements til say spring? with an automatic return to table? reason simply to reduce costs immediately to improve cash flow to a point where perhaps by the time you are obligated to return to the table REVs may have spiked due to DAL reductions (and lets not forget UAL probably has another 10% reduction before exit) ...
not the definitive answer but another thought from "outside the box" which apparently is where i wander alot
h34r: