Gun Threads - Merged

Again with the insults and no proof to back it up.  You have nothing to refute it and that is proof that you are just full of hot air.
 
It is factual.  You can deny history.  You can make up your own fantasies.  The sorry bottom line is you have nothing to back up your POV.  
 
Ms Tree said:
Again with the insults and no proof to back it up.  You have nothing to refute it and that is proof that you are just full of hot air.
 
It is factual.  You can deny history.  You can make up your own fantasies.  The sorry bottom line is you have nothing to back up your POV.  
Click to expand...
 
Sigh!...All I've ever seen you do is tell others to do their own research, yet you again prove yourself utterly incapable of doing just that. Countless examples of armed citizens saving themselves and others from harm are on easilly checked record. What possible shred from any even strangely fantasized "history" might you have to support even the slightest aspect of your own BS here?
 
EastUS1 said:
 
Sigh!...All I've ever seen you do is tell others to do their own research, yet you again prove yourself utterly incapable of doing just that. Countless examples of armed citizens saving themselves and others from harm are on easilly checked record. What even possible shred from (even strangely fantasized) "history" might you have to support even the slightest aspect of your own BS here?
Click to expand...
Drunk posting again?
 
Keep up.  We are not talking about armed citizens any more and I only posted what the FBI studied.  If you have issues with them they have a number you can call and let them know.  
 
Sigh!...All I've ever seen you do is tell others to do their own research, yet you again prove yourself utterly incapable of doing just that. Countless examples of armed citizens saving themselves and others from harm are on easilly checked record. What possible shred from any even strangely fantasized "history" might you have to support even the slightest aspect of your own BS here?
Ms Tree said:
Drunk posting again?
 
Keep up.  We are not talking about armed citizens any more and I only posted what the FBI studied.  If you have issues with them they have a number you can call and let them know.  
Click to expand...
 
In other words;  you've "got nuthin" to actually offer in way of reasoned debate of any kind.
 
In case you misssed the thread's title; permit me to repost it: "Good guy with a gun debunked".
 
Ms Tree: "We are not talking about armed citizens any more." What is this dicussion about then?...Ping Pong?
 
townpete said:
 
Rewriting history again?
 
Origins of Jim Crow lawshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws
During the Reconstruction period of 1865–1877, federal law provided civil rights protection in the U.S. South for freedmen, the African Americans who had formerly been slaves, and former free blacks. In the 1870s, Democrats gradually regained power in the Southern legislatures, having used insurgent paramilitary groups, such as the White League and Red Shirts, to disrupt Republican organizing, run Republican officeholders out of town, and intimidate blacks to suppress their voting. 
Click to expand...
 
Where exactly did I say republican or democrat in my post?  Here's a hint, I didn't.  Your problem seems to be  equating democrat with liberal and republican with conservative.  While that might be how people identify them now it does not mean they are synonymous.  There was a time when there were liberal republicans, Nelson Rockefeller would be in this group.  Just as there were conservative Democrats, George Wallace ring a bell?
 
My suggestion to you would be to work on your reading comprehesion skills and do some research before you repeat what you hear on talk radio.  Oh, and get yourself an education.
 
777 fixer said:
 
Where exactly did I say republican or democrat in my post?  Here's a hint, I didn't.  Your problem seems to be  equating democrat with liberal and republican with conservative.  While that might be how people identify them now it does not mean they are synonymous.  There was a time when there were liberal republicans, Nelson Rockefeller would be in this group.  Just as there were conservative Democrats, George Wallace ring a bell?
 
My suggestion to you would be to work on your reading comprehesion skills and do some research before you repeat what you hear on talk radio.  Oh, and get yourself an education.
Click to expand...
 
My suggestion is to at at least make a feeble attempt to know what you're talking about.
 
I'd say it's far past time we all get on board to pass more "sensible" car control laws immediately,  as well as anti-knife/sharp-stick/club/rock-paper-scissors/whatever of course. I mean seriously people; unless and until we ban everything that's proven to be dangerous...well...we might otherwise have to revert back to the nowadays totally unthinkable concept of personal responsibility, and what liberal "fun" would THAT be?
 
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=car+rams+people
 
P.S. I've yet to see anyone here successfully "debunk" any of the nearly countless situations where a "Good guy with gun" saved lives. Anyone actually have ANYTHING for that?....Anyone at all?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Insp4
Interesting read on Gun Control:
2 3 4
Replies
50
Views
6K
xUT
xUT
snapthis
Paranoid anti-gun parents & school's reaction
Replies
8
Views
1K
Ifly2
I
M
Rebecca's Battle
Replies
2
Views
849
mrbreeze
M
delldude
Power of the Sheriff
Replies
5
Views
2K
Dog Wonder
Dog Wonder
D
The Marketplace
Replies
0
Views
970
diogenes
D

Latest posts

Back
Top