Gun Threads - Merged

[townpete]

Lol.

Good one.

An inaccurate statement, but a good one, nonetheless...

 
You can't can you?
 
You just know you should hate them because you're told to.

 

[Dog Wonder]

 
You just know you should hate them because you're told to.

He couldn't get into the Drone Corps if he paid dues.

 

[Hackman]

Hakman can be your new boyfriend. He says he is like 5'11" and 320 (but built).
He will be the guy in the whataburger guarding his triple meat burger with large onion rings with an AR-15 slung on his back.

Looks like your trying to open your gay dating site again here Quagtard, stay in the closet and watch cartoons. Jeez 5'-11" and 320? I never took steroids, and 5'11" is kinda short. Must be another guy in your fantasy man dreams. BTW Whataburger has banned open carry in their burger joints, sorry no AR15 allowed if one follows the law. Case in point, cartoons will rot your brain Quagtard. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/07/13/texas-open-carry-guns-whataburger/30076367/

 

[Hackman]

I don't work for an airline....sorry.  And gosh...I got the gun type wrong.  But tell me...when he hears a shot ring out, how fast can he get that gun off his back...in his hands...aimed and fire back at the bad guy?  Or does he just start shooting as he's getting it off his back?    Like I said...he might as well be wearing a florescent green shirt that says "I'll be the first victim".

Unless your completely nutty like you, criminals prefer unarmed vitims. It would be rather dumb for criminals to see an open carry AR15 and start a gun fight with him/her, it's only in your libtard mind this happens. How fast a person can sling an AR15 around depends on the training and practice, I do know when I'm hunting and see a deer, it's quick, but I never timed it. You might ask a Iraq vet or a Swat officer this. Tell him your libtard shooting fantasy also, he will enjoy the chuckle.

Well...I'm not a former airline employee either.  Don't get the broomstick reference, unless you think I'm female.  
Then there is the obligatory "tard" usage.  So educate me about guns....dude with a rifle of some sort on his back. He knows what kind it is, but I obviously don't.  Bad guy bursts in and starts shooting.  How fast can he get that thing off his back, turn, aim and fire before the bad guy gets off a second shot?  
 
And you're right...I wouldn't stick around to engage a bad guy...even if I DID have a gun.  I would try to take cover first...THEN engage him.  But I'm so glad that there are "he men" in the world who won't make such a pussyish move like "take cover", but will bravely turn and face the gunman while pulling out his OWN weapon to save us all.

Fantasy shooting senerios again that never happen. Why don't you engage a guy with and open carry AR15 and see how fast he can engage? Burst in as a threat to him and find out what happens, then you will know the answer to the libtard shooting fantasy you keep repeating. In addition, "taking cover" is nice if one has time, but in your stupid fantasy of seeing a open carry AK47 (really a better AR 15) and engaging in a shoot out with them, no time to do so I guess. You had the "pussyish" part right, you would probably cower in fear or run. Like I said, it's pointless fantasy you have.

 

[Kev3188]

That's just it; in KC's scenario, there's no "bursting in." It's a quick 1-2 shot deal to neutralize the ammosexual (who'll never know what hit him, btw), and then to continue on doing whatever evil one has planned.

 

[Hackman]

Oh I see, your just gonna quietly snipe the open carry guy in the back and continue on your merry murderous path as planned. Just one problem with this libtards of gun tactics idiocy, you forgot about the other guys that are not open carrying, and you get popped by a Glock 21 that holds 13 rounds of .45 man-stoppers. Or worse (for you) a hand cannon Desert Eagle .50 that would blow your cowardly guts into the street with one hit. Thanks for playing. Now if ants had machine guns...

 

[Kev3188]

It's not an issue of "sniping." The ammosexual just gets picked off first, and then the "merry murderous path" (your term, not mine) continues. Remember, the idea is to cause as many casualties as possible in as short of time as possible, and these people usually aren't planning on getting out alive, anyway.

 

[KCFlyer]

It's not an issue of "sniping." The ammosexual just gets picked off first, and then the "merry murderous path" (your term, not mine) continues. Remember, the idea is to cause as many casualties as possible in as short of time as possible, and these people usually aren't planning on getting out alive, anyway.

 
ANs what the hero's of concealed carry never seem to take into account is that 1) they assume that everybody else is carrying and 2) they are assuming that all of them are well trained in the use of a gun.  Here in Kansas, our republican governor and legislature passed a law that allows concealed carry without a permit OR training.  You don't even have to know what end of the gun is the "business end"...buy, conceal and carry.  A gal I know who is pretty right wing isn't really happy about that.  When permits and training WERE required, many of the "ladies" who were getting their CC permits were more concerned about how nicely the pink on their guns matched their purses than they were about learning what the safety was. 

 

[Veritas777]

It's not an issue of "sniping." The ammosexual just gets picked off first, and then the "merry murderous path" (your term, not mine) continues. Remember, the idea is to cause as many casualties as possible in as short of time as possible, and these people usually aren't planning on getting out alive, anyway.

 
Has that ever happen? Why do some of you make up stories then present them as factual? What if, What if, What if

 

[Hackman]

It's not an issue of "sniping." The ammosexual just gets picked off first, and then the "merry murderous path" (your term, not mine) continues. Remember, the idea is to cause as many casualties as possible in as short of time as possible, and these people usually aren't planning on getting out alive, anyway.

Hmm (as KCfryer says) so "I'd have a huge advantage" "their backs are turned" "they are soft targets" (never seen an armed soft target libtards) isn't that sniping? You know what the term is right? Your gonna shoot three well armed open carry guys in the back, case closed and then do whatever. Right. I really do doubt it, very very much. At least in states that have CHL, that's non-libtard states. If the plan is "cause as many casualties as possible" so the armed bad guy takes on three armed "soft targets"? I guess the "gun free zones" must be working in the libtard fantasy shooting senerio. Just not in the real world. Keep dreaming libtards.

 

[Kev3188]

 
Has that ever happen? Why do some of you make up stories then present them as factual? What if, What if, What if

Of course it's a "what if."

If you saw what I wrote as anything other than hypothetical, I can't help you...

 

[KCFlyer]

 
Has that ever happen? Why do some of you make up stories then present them as factual? What if, What if, What if

 
No...it hasn't happened yet.  But you know...right up to the day the first elementary school was shot dead, that hadn't happened yet either.   And right up to the moment that first moviegoer was shot - it hadn't happened.  And considering most of these legal gun owners were mentally unstable, it won't surprise me when the first restaurant or movie theater with many patrons sitting around with their guns safely in their holsters (and uncomfortable against their leg...after all, the rifle just gets in the way at a movie) settle into their theater seats is attacked....THEN we'll have that first time under our belts.  

 

[Kev3188]

Hmm (as KCfryer says) so "I'd have a huge advantage" "their backs are turned" "they are soft targets" (never seen an armed soft target libtards) isn't that sniping? You know what the term is right? Your gonna shoot three well armed open carry guys in the back, case closed and then do whatever. Right. I really do doubt it, very very much. At least in states that have CHL, that's non-libtard states. If the plan is "cause as many casualties as possible" so the armed bad guy takes on three armed "soft targets"? I guess the "gun free zones" must be working in the libtard fantasy shooting senerio. Just not in the real world. Keep dreaming libtards.

I was thinking "sniper" in the military context- pick your target, lie in wait for the perfect shot, etc.

These soft target attacks are much more messy, and a whole lot less clinical than that.

The bad guy doesn't have to "take on" anyone; 3 quick rounds, and the last thing the ammosexuals see is the Subway menu they're staring at....

 

[Hackman]

Of course it's a "what if."
If you saw what I wrote as anything other than hypothetical, I can't help you...

Hypothetical libtard idiocy of fantasy shooting easily shot down in flames. "Cause as many casualties as possible". Take on three open carry guys to accomplish that, is too funny. Damn funniest libtard story ever, whew weee LOL.

 

[Kev3188]

Yes, as many casualties as possible in as short of time as possible.

Again, a bad guy wouldn't have to "take on" anyone; in the scenario-and picture-we're discussing, their backs are turned, and they're thinking about food.

So yeah; they get to advertise their, um, "inadequacies," and maybe freak out a soccer mom or two, but in the end, they're as "soft" of target as anyone else in that restaurant.