Gun Threads - Merged

KCFlyer said:
If I were a bad guy, I'd have a huge advantage.  Their backs are to me.   They are more concerned about what toppings to put on their hot dogs.  They are "soft targets".   I take out the guy with the sidearm first, the guy in the middle second, and the guy with the AK on his back third.   And yes...there was a guy who was shooting at cops at a Dallas police substation in June of last year.
Please stick to serving drinks and slinging airline hash to angry passengers rather than making yourself look stupid here with your silly libtard assault tactics. You don't even know what weapon the guy has slung on his back. Hint: that "mean black assault rifle" is not an "AK".
I will just leave it right there. Thanks for playing.
 
Ifly2 said:
I've given up trying to figure out how the tough guys so easily feel threatened by common courtesy and civil behaviour and the like
Must be massively insecure
There is no have to
Waiting for the next ignorant comment
Won't be long
Just attempting to understand which lie is the right one. You call Ms Fly or ring the door bell? At least stick to one lie so you don't get confused. Common courtesy and civil discourse is not a libtard trait you display, and now you cry foul. Your a tough guy with guns right? You seem to think that makes one a bad ass, and REAL trained educated gun owners know that's just not the case. Another falsehood the leftist morons push to demonize what they hate; firearms and those who L E G A L L Y own them.
I'm not the one spewing anti-gun bile and tragic events used to blame law abiding gun owners, you and your backasswards libtards are.
I'm fully secure, the insecurity rests on your side Iflew2, simply because your anti second amendment agenda has failed, time and time again.
Obammy is the best gun salesmen in history. That hurts don't it?
 
Dog Wonder said:
Why do you care?  At your house the lights are on but nobody's home.
Isn't that cute, one-line Wonder Mutt comes to the rescue of Iflew2. Don't write too many lies like Iflew2 sweetykins, or you'll be more confused than you are....if that's possible. Do that libtard howl.
 
Hackman said:
Please stick to serving drinks and slinging airline hash to angry passengers rather than making yourself look stupid here with your silly libtard assault tactics. You don't even know what weapon the guy has slung on his back. Hint: that "mean black assault rifle" is not an "AK".
I will just leave it right there. Thanks for playing.
 
I don't work for an airline....sorry.  And gosh...I got the gun type wrong.  But tell me...when he hears a shot ring out, how fast can he get that gun off his back...in his hands...aimed and fire back at the bad guy?  Or does he just start shooting as he's getting it off his back?    Like I said...he might as well be wearing a florescent green shirt that says "I'll be the first victim".  
 
Hackman said:
Isn't that cute, one-line Wonder Mutt comes to the rescue of Iflew2. Don't write too many lies like Iflew2 sweetykins, or you'll be more confused than you are....if that's possible. Do that libtard howl.
Count the insults.  That must have stung.,
 
My bad, I guess you are old and retired from an airline and KCFly on a broomstick. No matter, you still have no clue what your talking about. You got the gun wrong, and everything else. All you know is no guns, no second amendment, and that's that. Lawful gun owners know this, its failed everytime. Your libtard shooting scenario is just fantasies and delusions of death and destruction that have about a 99.999% of not happening. Therefore, explaining how to deal with these lefty delusions of tactics used or deployed is at best, a waste of time. You wouldn't stick around to even engage a bad guy, so it's pointless.
 
KCFlyer said:
 
I don't work for an airline....sorry.  And gosh...I got the gun type wrong.  But tell me...when he hears a shot ring out, how fast can he get that gun off his back...in his hands...aimed and fire back at the bad guy?  Or does he just start shooting as he's getting it off his back?    Like I said...he might as well be wearing a florescent green shirt that says "I'll be the first victim".  
 
You've probably never owned a gun, nor shot one, but somehow knows what someone would do with one?
 
Thank god you never worked for an airline or any machinery in general.
 
Hakman can be your new boyfriend. He says he is like 5'11" and 320 (but built).

He will be the guy in the whataburger guarding his triple meat burger with large onion rings with an AR-15 slung on his back.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Hakman can be your new boyfriend. He says he is like 5'11" and 320 (but built).

He will be the guy in the whataburger guarding his triple meat burger with large onion rings with an AR-15 slung on his back.
 
We all know what you liberals would do. 
 
Wet yourself, scream hysterical, faint, etc
 
Hackman said:
My bad, I guess you are old and retired from an airline and KCFly on a broomstick. No matter, you still have no clue what your talking about. You got the gun wrong, and everything else. All you know is no guns, no second amendment, and that's that. Lawful gun owners know this, its failed everytime. Your libtard shooting scenario is just fantasies and delusions of death and destruction that have about a 99.999% of not happening. Therefore, explaining how to deal with these lefty delusions of tactics used or deployed is at best, a waste of time. You wouldn't stick around to even engage a bad guy, so it's pointless.
 
Well...I'm not a former airline employee either.  Don't get the broomstick reference, unless you think I'm female.  
Then there is the obligatory "tard" usage.  So educate me about guns....dude with a rifle of some sort on his back. He knows what kind it is, but I obviously don't.  Bad guy bursts in and starts shooting.  How fast can he get that thing off his back, turn, aim and fire before the bad guy gets off a second shot?  
 
And you're right...I wouldn't stick around to engage a bad guy...even if I DID have a gun.  I would try to take cover first...THEN engage him.  But I'm so glad that there are "he men" in the world who won't make such a pussyish move like "take cover", but will bravely turn and face the gunman while pulling out his OWN weapon to save us all. 
 
KCFlyer said:
 
......Bad guy bursts in and starts shooting.  How fast can he get that thing off his back, turn, aim and fire before the bad guy gets off a second shot?  
 
And you're right...I wouldn't stick around to engage a bad guy...even if I DID have a gun.  I would try to take cover first.......... 
 
One might reasonably suggest that an average thug/"bad guy" might just become a bit more reticent to "start shooting" if even seeing armed individuals in his intended robbery site. If it's an issue of hard core terrorists, well, being armed at least provides for a much higher chance of survival than not.
 
Holding the apparently necessary notion that you would always "try to take cover first" speaks volumes about the full extent of your tactical knowledge. For simple sake of argument; let's assume you're inside, say, a mini-mart. Exactly what form of actually viable "cover" would you possibly expect to even be found there? Hint: Trying to hide behind a row of Doritos wouldn't much help....
 
Hackman said:
So which is it? You call or ring the door bell? Or do you ring the door bell, call, then do the secret knock, jump around three times, howl like a Wonder Mutt, and say honey daddy is home?! I'm really trying to understand which lie to believe.
 
"I'm really trying to understand which lie to believe."  You're not the only one...
 
Perhaps we're just not sufficiently paranoid so's to fully understand any possible "logic" there. Simple creature that I am; I've always cheerfully assumed that anyone putting a key into the front door lock to open it (at least probably) doesn't immediately deserve a salvo of rounds to greet them, and target identification prior to firing is a given, but, not being an expert liberal who was never "trained to fight" though....what do I know?
 
Back
Top