Light Years
Veteran
- Aug 27, 2002
- 2,878
- 0
Outrageous as it sounds it sounds like something they might pull. Keep giving them ideas Chip, as long as your job is safe, huh?
Routes like PIT-MSP and PHL-ATL are already flown by other airlines with jet aircraft. I dont care how many seats it has, whether you call it Express, Connection, or Airlink, its outsourcing of our flying. So of course this management would love to outsource Airbus flying too.
Ryan International operates A320s for AirTran. Not a single AirTran employee is used- its like the setup USAir had British Airways. CCY would LOVE a setup like this. Watch out for your scope clauses, folks, we've already given away enough of the store with little hope of getting it back.
Do the FA's have a scope clause or does it just go with the pilots? For example, could AFA had said that US FAs must operate 70 seaters even if US pilots didnt?
And yeah, who at US is a Teamster?
Routes like PIT-MSP and PHL-ATL are already flown by other airlines with jet aircraft. I dont care how many seats it has, whether you call it Express, Connection, or Airlink, its outsourcing of our flying. So of course this management would love to outsource Airbus flying too.
Ryan International operates A320s for AirTran. Not a single AirTran employee is used- its like the setup USAir had British Airways. CCY would LOVE a setup like this. Watch out for your scope clauses, folks, we've already given away enough of the store with little hope of getting it back.
Do the FA's have a scope clause or does it just go with the pilots? For example, could AFA had said that US FAs must operate 70 seaters even if US pilots didnt?
And yeah, who at US is a Teamster?