Fll Announcement On Monday At 10:30

Doesn't Lakefield live in FLL?

Posted on Sun, Aug. 22, 2004
US Airways plans Fort Lauderdale hub
Will be jumping off point to Caribbean, Latin America
TED REED
Staff Writer

Even as it struggles to reduce the high costs that threaten its survival, US Airways is hatching plans to establish a small Caribbean and Latin American hub at Florida's Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport.

The nation's seventh-largest airline is scheduled to announce Monday that the hub will open early in 2005, with service to about 15 new cities in Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean and the Northeast. It currently serves four cities, including Charlotte, from Fort Lauderdale.

"We see opportunities to expand our Caribbean and Latin American presence out of South Florida and we intend to build on those opportunities," US Airways spokesman David Castelveter said Saturday.

The airline's plans were first reported in The Miami Herald. Airplanes will become available as US Airways continues to reduce its operations in Pittsburgh.

The South Florida strategy is being unveiled as US Airways continues its efforts to convince its four largest unions to accept $800 million in annual pay cuts, part of an effort to reduce annual costs by $1.5 billion.

The airline emerged from bankruptcy in 2003 but is still losing money. On Friday, rating agency Standard & Poor's lowered ratings on its credit, already at junk bond levels, for the third time this year.

Negotiators for US Airways and its pilots continued to talk Saturday, trying to hammer out a deal that would save the airline $295 million annually. Pilots would become the first union to reach agreement on a cost-cutting deal.

Jack Stephan, spokesman for the US Airways chapter of the Air Line Pilots Association, said pilots made a new proposal Friday, but declined to provide details or to specify a date when the talks might conclude. "We're prepared to go as long as it takes," he said.

US Airways has its largest hub in Charlotte, where it employs 5,743 and operates nonstop flights from Charlotte/Douglas International Airport to 118 destinations including 18 in the Caribbean and Latin America.

Castelveter said establishment of the South Florida hub would have a minimal impact on Charlotte. US Airways recently announced plans to add three more Charlotte-Caribbean flights -- to Barbados; George Town, Bahamas; and Liberia, Costa Rica -- by mid-February.

The Fort Lauderdale flights would be aimed primarily at the large South Florida population with ties to the Caribbean and Latin America, Castelveter said. Connections also would be offered to a handful of Northeast destinations.

"US Airways has already built strength throughout the Caribbean and they have developed a fair amount of expertise in those markets, so this makes enormous sense," said David Field, Americas editor of London-based Airline Business magazine.

Darryl Jenkins, aviation consultant and professor at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, Fla., noted the airline is making money in the Caribbean. "They need to go more places where they can make money," he said.

Among U.S. airlines, US Airways has the second-largest Caribbean presence. American Airlines is first in the region, which it serves primarily from its hub at Miami International Airport.

The fast-growing Fort Lauderdale airport has outpaced Miami in attracting low-cost, low-fare domestic carriers such as Southwest Airlines and JetBlue Airways, and now will be able to compete internationally.

US Airways' destinations will include: Cancun, Mexico; Guatemala City, Guatemala; Panama City; Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic; Kingston, Jamaica; and Providenciales in the Turks and Caicos Islands.

US Airways is under severe financial pressure.

It must pay about $130 million to its pension plans by Sept. 15, and it must meet financial requirements associated with $720 million in federal loan guarantees on Sept. 30.

It has said it may file a second time for bankruptcy protection, which would enable it to delay the pension payments.

Also, a bankruptcy court can set aside existing labor contracts and force negotiations on new ones.

US Airways has been formulating its South Florida strategy for months, Jenkins said. Nevertheless, the announcement comes days after Chairman David Bronner said if the airline can't secure four labor agreements by mid-September, it will be forced into bankruptcy court and may never emerge.

Field called the unveiling of the new strategy "a bold statement" that gives the airline a chance to reassure passengers that it plans to remain in business.
 
700UW said:
Doesn't Lakefield live in FLL?



Field called the unveiling of the new strategy "a bold statement" that gives the airline a chance to reassure passengers that it plans to remain in business.
[post="171495"][/post]​



Gentle way of saying Bronner's big mouth as usual had a very negative impact on bookings with any sane passenger booking away afraid to death of being stranded.

It's like saying: Look everyone, we really do have plan, please trust us. O-N-E__ M-O-R-E__T-I-M-E......While The Wolf Is At The Door.


Hope it works out for the ones left standing.
 
cavalier said:
List them smart A-Z-Z...LIST THE POINTS

List all the positive points that clearly shows U has a bright and firm future, a place where employees can enjoy a long and bright future. Put on your happy face and explain to me and everyone why thinking U is doomed is illogical.

Come on smart fellow make me look the fool, here I am, I’m calling you out.
[post="171367"][/post]​
Pot calling what kettle black? Please!!! Come on be positive! Are you this sad?
 
usfliboi said:
Pot calling what kettle black? Please!!! Come on be positive! Are you this sad?
[post="171508"][/post]​


When readers see "usfliboi" they normally act accordingly and blow off the noise.

I see you too failed to address all the positives that will assure U's future.
 
Why has it taken so long for US or another airline to se FLL as a hub to South America? I had to pay $800.00 to fly Avianca to Barranquilla, Colombia in July; Aviancs sucks. AA used to fly to BAQ( flew them 2 previous trip) but it switched to the bigger market in MED. The politicians in Bogota only allow AA to 3 Colombian cities. BAQ would be a great market for US given the high fares. Will the Colombian politicos let them? From Fll there is a greater chance, lots of Colombians with homes in Broward and Aventura would love to avoid the Miami airport. Right now US seems to only fly the Caribean and Central America but I urge them to fly to South America, deeply South. They will need the 757 with its 3500 mile range & hopefully the 767 or A330 if they make to Buenos Aires, Sao Paulo, Rio or Santiago. I wish US success it in second international area, take advantage of Varig in Brazil which is Star alliance memeber. FLL to GRU should be a goal.
 
With respect to AA, there are over 5M Hispanics in the northeast (over 2.5M who are not Cuban, Puerto Rican or Mexican). The feeder flights from LGA, BWI, BOS, PHL, DCA, EWR should be very helpful to fill these new flights even if AA increase frequency out of MIA. AA decreased its SJU frequency in PHL once US entered the market. I would bet there are lot of loyal US DM members who will jump at the opportunity to fly US to Central America rather than AA. It will be interesting to see AA's reaction. I thought that their reaction to Carib flights out of PHL would have been much different. There was no choice but AA prior to US jumping in that market.
 
USA320Pilot said:
Lark:

Who first reported on this website the company would expand service to Guatemala City, Panama City and San Salvador?

Was it that 25-year vet?

Respectfully,

USA320Pilot
[post="171281"][/post]​


Which 25 year vet?

I know of a 19+ year vet who was hired 4/10/85 who likes to make millions of predictions so that, by pure chance, a few will come true.
 
algflyr said:
This is not true, FLL has 3 runways (actually 6). The short one is only 5276' and may present some takeoff issues, but landing should be OK and the other runways shouldn't be a problem.
[post="171384"][/post]​

FLL is, for all intents and purposes, a one runway airport for jet airline operations. The diagonal and parallel runways are noise sensitive in the EXTREME! Back in the Piedmont Florida Shuttle days, they tried to use the short parallel for F28 operations and the folks from the surrounding neighborhoods nearly had a lynching party for the airport manager. The airline had to promise NOT to use that runway for jets in order to keep the peace. The diagonal is only used by jets when there is no other alternative, and it is also fairly short.

The one runway operation should be sufficient under most circumstance as long as USAirways doesn't do a PHL number and try to schedule all the airplanes to arrive and depart at the same times. It may become a problem if USAirways actually becomes successful in the effort at FLL and the inevitable vultures show up to add competing service. Then runway saturation might be a factor.
 
700UW said:
Rules are rules, but I know you are an anti-union Bush loving Republican.

Rules are rules, I don't see you making a big deal out of the company breaking the rules.
[post="171310"][/post]​

That's it, you have no rational response so you attack the poster. For the record, I have supported the IAM in fighting the Airbus farmout, and the company was dead wrong there. I thought the IAM was wrong in shang-haing the planner group without a representation vote, nor a vote on their accretion agreement. I think it was a money grab for more dues plain and simple.

Maybe the fact is that you truly cannot stand someone who can think independently for themselves without looking for the AFL-CIO talking points?
 
628AU,

Your fellow planners and material controllers signed Authorization Cards to join the IAM.

When the card were presented to the National Mediation Board, the board ruled that those two groups were all ready part of the class and craft and therefore accredited the group into the Mechanic and Related contract. But you have been explained this many times in the past along with your friend AOG, that is the governments ruling on it and the company fought it and lost.

When you get accretied you fall under the existing contract and then you negoitate the particulars for your group, you had members of your group on the negotiating committee, and if you failed to give your input to those members then shame on you. And you did get the opportunity three times to vote on concessions that effected your group.

But I guess it is easier to blame someone else instead of yourself for not getting involved and help shape your future.

If you dont like being a union member you can always seek work somewhere else, no one forced you to stay at US, so if you get recalled is being part of a union gonna stop you from coming back?
 
http://www.nmb.gov/representation/deter2001/28n030.html
(You have to have 35% of the current group to file for an election)

On February 8, 2000, the IAM filed an application with the Board requesting elections for US Airways' Planners, Crew Schedulers, and Administrative Representatives. In the alternative, the IAM sought to represent the Office Clerical craft or class. Because there was a question regarding craft or class, the Board assigned the matter File No. CR-6679. On May 16, 2000, the IAM amended its position, contending that Planners "belong in the Mechanics and Related craft or class as the Board held in Allegheny Airlines, Inc., 6 NMB 359 (1977)."

On June 18, 2000, the Investigator in CR-6679 ruled that Planners were part of the Mechanics and Related craft or class. The Board dismissed CR-6679 based upon the IAM's withdrawal of its application.(2) US Airways, Inc., 27 NMB 565 (2000). The Board did not apply its bar rule contained in 29 CFR § 1206.4(B). Id. at 567.

On September 14, 2000, the IAM filed this application alleging a representation dispute among US Airways' Planners. The Organization requested the Board to accrete Planners into the Mechanics and Related craft or class. The Board assigned this application File No. CR-6697 and assigned Mary L. Johnson as the Investigator.

US Airways submitted a position statement on September 29, 2000. The Carrier asserted that accretion in this matter would be "improper," as it would "violate longstanding patterns of representation" on US Airways and other carriers. US Airways also argued that there is no community of interest between the employees covered by the application and the Mechanics and Related craft or class.

On October 20, 2000, the IAM filed a response to US Airways' position statement. The Organization stated that Planners share a work-related community of interest with Mechanics and Related Employees.

The Carrier provided a final position statement on November 6, 2000, and the IAM filed a final response on November 10, 2000.

CONCLUSION
With the exception of the positions of Instructor-Central Load Planning and Aircraft Router, the positions at issue in this case share a work-related community of interest with US Airways'

Mechanics and Related Employees. Therefore, these positions are covered by the IAM's certification in R-4593. File No. CR-6697 is converted to R-6796 and the application is dismissed.
By direction of the NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD.
Stephen E. Crable
Chief of Staff

You can click on the hypelink up top to read the whole case.
 
Back
Top