Ive never heard of a "union Contract" that agreed to not only set a wage so low that the company could not hire people but also let the company raise the starting wage-AT THEIR SOLE DISCRETION!
Has anyone out there ever seen anything like this before? In a union contract that is?
When I show our contract to other Union people I know, they are stunned. Most claim that with a contract like this we are stretching it by saying that we have a union contract.
If the company insisted on such a low wage, and we gave it to them, then we should make them live with it. If they say they cant get people then we make permanent changes not just allow them to raise and lower starting pay as they see fit. When the crunch came it would have been the perfect opportunity to eliminate the long progression to top pay.
Has anyone out there ever seen anything like this before? In a union contract that is?
When I show our contract to other Union people I know, they are stunned. Most claim that with a contract like this we are stretching it by saying that we have a union contract.
If the company insisted on such a low wage, and we gave it to them, then we should make them live with it. If they say they cant get people then we make permanent changes not just allow them to raise and lower starting pay as they see fit. When the crunch came it would have been the perfect opportunity to eliminate the long progression to top pay.