Election Night Results....

EastUS1 said:
 I have been arguing that both parties are corrupt long before you strolled on to this forum.
 
Lying or purely delusional BS. You've supported notions on gun "control", and even advocated actions by force against the Bundy ranch situation, just for starters. Which, by your own admission rather flawed and "corrupt" party should have that kind of power?
 
Try actually THINKING for a change. Again, have a fine evening and good night.
 
Imagining things again?  Do you see dead people also?  Never supported gun control.  It's a useless venture.  Bundy violated the law.  That has nothing to do with either party.  Simply has to do with Bundy thinking he can get a free ride.  The guy is a thief and should be brought to justice.  
 
Not sure why you think insulting me will help your short comings.  Perhaps professional help would benefit you.  I am sure EAP can point yo in the right direction if you need assistance finding help.
 
Ms Tree said:
Bundy violated the law.  That has nothing to do with either party.
 
It doesn't? Seriously? Are you truly THAT naive? Exactly who makes "the law" and continually determines on whom it will be often rather selectively enforced? ;)
 
Again, however futile the suggestion: Try actually THINKING for a change.
 
EastUS1 said:
 
It doesn't? Seriously? Are you truly THAT naive? Exactly who makes "the law" and continually determines on whom it will be often rather selectively enforced? ;)
 
Again, however futile the suggestion: Try actually THINKING for a change.
Grazing laws for federal land have been in place for more than 6 years.  In fact Bundy has not paid the fees since 1993.  Just in case you need help, 1993 was before 2008.  Bundy has been a thief since Clinton was in office.
 
Damn, it's all Clintons fault.  That rat bastard.
 
Again, however futile the suggestion.  Seek help.  You have lots of issues to work on so get started now.  I'm guessing you are pretty old so you should get started as soon as possible.  You might not have that much time left.
 
Still cant find anything on the unicorn rider?  I gave you two really good hints.  I'm sure if you keep at it you will stumble upon the info.  Even a blind squirrel finds a nut every now and then. 
 
Ms Tree said:
Grazing laws for federal land have been in place for more than 6 years.  In fact Bundy has not paid the fees since 1993.  Just in case you need help, 1993 was before 2008.  Bundy has been a thief since Clinton was in office.
 
Damn, it's all Clintons fault.  That rat bastard.
 
Again, however futile the suggestion.  Seek help.  You have lots of issues to work on so get started now.  I'm guessing you are pretty old so you should get started as soon as possible.  You might not have that much time left.
 
 
"1993 was before 2008.  Bundy has been a thief since Clinton was in office." So why then, was it only seemingly needed to form up an armed force to confront the issue when harry reid's interests were involved?
 
"I'm guessing you are pretty old.." Yep, which affords me far too many years of watching the childishly naive notions of such as yourself play needless havoc on the world, and properly allows the following suggestion: Grow up.
 
EastUS1 said:
 
It doesn't? Seriously? Are you truly THAT naive? Exactly who makes "the law" and continually determines on whom it will be often rather selectively enforced? ;)
 
Again, however futile the suggestion: Try actually THINKING for a change.
Ms Tree CHOOSES to be naive. You will find libtards can do that at their convenience, especially when presented with hard, documented facts.
 
in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections.
 
Even though this is factual information provided by the CDC look how the libtards react to it. They refuse to accept it because it does not support their agenda.  According to them gay relationships are "natural" and "healthy".
 
EastUS1 said:
"1993 was before 2008.  Bundy has been a thief since Clinton was in office." So why then, was it only seemingly needed to form up an armed force to confront the issue when harry reid's interests were involved?
 
"I'm guessing you are pretty old.." Yep, which affords me far too many years of watching the childishly naive notions of such as yourself play needless havoc on the world, and properly allows the following suggestion: Grow up.
wrong question. You should be asking why he was allowed to get away with that for over 20 years.

You are confusing what you think you have experienced with senility. It happens with older folks. Grow up to be a senile ignorant old far like you? If that is how you define ."grown" then I'll pass.

Still no luck finding the unicorn rider? I gave you two great hints. It should be easy for a person of your advanced age and skill. Perhaps you should try one of those brain exercise programs to help kick start the old nogin.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Ms Tree CHOOSES to be naive. You will find libtards can do that at their convenience, especially when presented with hard, documented facts.
 
in 2010, MSM accounted for 78% of new HIV infections among males and 63% of all new infections.
 
Even though this is factual information provided by the CDC look how the libtards react to it. They refuse to accept it because it does not support their agenda.  According to them gay relationships are "natural" and "healthy".
Are you lost again? You should get someone to pin a $20 to your shirt so you can get returned to where ever you came from.

This thread has to do with the election night results. Now granted the current exchange is not directly related but your post is so far off base it's out of orbit with you. Not to mention that it was ignored the previous several times you posted and will be ignored here as well.

Now run along and go find one of.your playmates to entertain your self.
 
Ms Tree said:
wrong question. You should be asking why he was allowed to get away with that for over 20 years.

You are confusing what you think you have experienced with senility. It happens with older folks. Grow up to be a senile ignorant old far like you? If that is how you define ."grown" then I'll pass.

Still no luck finding the unicorn rider?
 
 
1) Why should anyone even ask that? If it was "OK" for "over 20 years", then perhaps, even by simply way of setting an established precedent, then it was indeed OK...No? Have you even heard of that as a legal or even philosophically rational concept? You were the one lusting for violent bloodshed at the Bundy ranch. I was the one questioning the virulent insanity of killing anyone over..what?...Back taxes? ;) Sigh!...I know your "sort", and such pee their pants and hide at the sound of the first shot...but if "others" can be made to do your bidding, you're nothing short of "heroic" in your "principles".
 
2) No worries, little princess. I was actually, long-ago-now amazed to have ever survived to even my 40th birthday, given the nature of the "job" and the then "working conditions." Every day since has been nothing short of a truly amazing gift.
 
3) "Still no luck finding the unicorn rider?" No frets. You're found. :)
 
EastUS1 said:
1) Why should anyone even ask that? if it was "OK" for "over 20 years", then perhaps, even by simply way of setting an established precedent, then it was indeed OK...No? have you even heard of that as a legal or even philosophically rational concept?
2) No worries, little princess. I was actually, long-ago-now amazed to have ever survived to my 40th birthday, given the nature of the "job" and the then "working conditions." Every day since has been nothing short of a truly amazing gift. ;)
3) "Still no luck finding the unicorn rider?" No frets. You're found. :)
Just like a republican. Never mind that other farmers paid the fees for grazing on public lands. Never mind that he is getting to make a dime off of land he does not own. You are such a hypocrite. I note the law when it does not suit you.

Whoppty doooo.

To lazy to even search the quotes? Are you afraid of find out you were wrong yet again? I would have guessed you'd be used to it by now.
 
Ms Tree said:
wrong question. You should be asking why he was allowed to get away with that for over 20 years.

You are confusing what you think you have experienced with senility. It happens with older folks. Grow up to be a senile ignorant old far like you? If that is how you define ."grown" then I'll pass.

Still no luck finding the unicorn rider? I gave you two great hints. It should be easy for a person of your advanced age and skill. Perhaps you should try one of those brain exercise programs to help kick start the old nogin.
Giving great hints is how Ms Tree wastes peoples time by sending them on wild goose chases of irrelevancy. It is a tried and true libtard tactic.
 
Libtards love giving "facts" but HATE being asked to back them. That is their "way out card" because nobody wants to waste their time finding proof that will not be accepted anyway.
 
You can keep your "hints" Ms Tree. If you can't back up what you say then STFU.
 
Ms Tree said:
Not to mention that it was ignored the previous several times you posted and will be ignored here as well.
Exactly.
 
You ignore facts that don't back your libtard agenda.
 
I show facts and back up what I say. You refuse to accept it. You state facts with NOTHING to back your claim, then tell other people to go find proof of it. 
 
EastUS1 said:
Then you've clearly no possible excuse for supporting the idea of growing guv-mint intrusion into peoples' lives, unless you're a complete and total fool, of course.
Ms Tree said:
I never  have supported it.  Only a fool would think I have.
Yes you have. Anybody that reads your posts knows this to be true.  Keep selling your B.S. though.
 
EastUS1 said:
 
Reset your label-maker at least a bit child. I'm a Libertarian.
Sure you are gramps.  Is that what the name tag on your shirt says?  Perhaps you picked up the wrong shirt at the nursing home?
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
Giving great hints is how Ms Tree wastes peoples time by sending them on wild goose chases of irrelevancy. It is a tried and true libtard tactic.
 
Libtards love giving "facts" but HATE being asked to back them. That is their "way out card" because nobody wants to waste their time finding proof that will not be accepted anyway.
 
You can keep your "hints" Ms Tree. If you can't back up what you say then STFU.
They are two quotes you dolt.  No goose chase.  All you have to do is look them up.  OH crap.  Never mind.  I just realized that you for you that would be a wild goose chase. 

 
Hearing you talk about facts is like hearing Charles Manson talk about social skills.  The quotes are facts.  A person said them.  Perhaps you can find a friend who can help you look them up. 

 
The hints did back up the claim.  You are just bitter because you lack the capability to look them up to see for your self.

 

 
 

Latest posts

Back
Top