WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Thread Starter
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #16
no YOU are wrong.
You can't accept that DL never bought the refinery to make a standalone profit.
DL bought it to supply fuel at a lower cost than the market would otherwise provide.
DL's reduction in fuel costs is far greater than the losses at the refinery.
religion has nothing to do with this discussion. What religion do you practice that says that incessant arguing is acceptable instead of admitting that someone else is right?
Maybe you and your coworkers and the stockholders of your airline will get a little religion when it becomes apparent that DL has a strategy to save costs that you won't admit and they can't match.
You can't accept that DL never bought the refinery to make a standalone profit.
DL bought it to supply fuel at a lower cost than the market would otherwise provide.
DL's reduction in fuel costs is far greater than the losses at the refinery.
religion has nothing to do with this discussion. What religion do you practice that says that incessant arguing is acceptable instead of admitting that someone else is right?
Maybe you and your coworkers and the stockholders of your airline will get a little religion when it becomes apparent that DL has a strategy to save costs that you won't admit and they can't match.