All airlines play the seasonal game...HPearlyretiree said:Profitable airlines don't park planes. And if this is such a good strategy, how come other airlines don't do this all the time?
Spin, spin, spin
All airlines will try to do more MX work during the "off-peak" season (thus fly less) and less MX flying during the "peak" season (thus fly more).
Furthermore, airlines will try to shift capacity on the basis of seasons as well... JB for example, probably flys more N/S in the winter and more E/W in the summer, because of seasonal demand patterns.
I think it is erroneous to say "name an airline who parks 1/3 of its fleet in Sept"... because Song is just a subset of Delta... I would bet that Song's "reduction" in September is just a strategic arrangement of Delta's overall MX Plan in an effort to pump up the numbers at Song (Sept's effect will be less bad for Song, but about the same for DAL overall...) My bet is that this is just a method for folks trying to justify Song's existance to pump up their financial numbers by losing less money in September, a particularly and notoriously bad month for airlines...
You don't think 9/11/01 occurred on a Tuesday (worst day of the week) in September (worst month of the year) by accident, do you? My point is that if the terrorists know this is true, then so do the airline management folks.
BTW - if revenue does not cover variable costs (i.e. labor, fuel, landing fees, things only incurred if the plane actually flies), then it is actually better to park the airplane.
Profit/Loss = Revenue - Cost
Cost = Fixed Costs + Variable Costs
Therefore: Profit/Loss = Revenue - (Fixed Costs + Variable Costs)
If Revenue is 10 and Variable Cost is 11, you are guaranteed a Loss of at least 1.
If fixed costs are 2, You lose 2 by not operating and 3 by operating. The loss minimization comes by canceling the operation. (Very Simple example)