WorldTraveler
Corn Field
- Dec 5, 2003
- 21,709
- 10,662
- Banned
- #16
The reality is that there are higher percentages of AMTs in DL's engine shops than there are in other parts of their Tech Ops operation - and certainly more than in many outsourced MROs, so DL is in fact creating more high value jobs by insourcing engine maintenance and outsourcing lower value work.As I can see your not an AMT, it doesnt take a more "qualified" AMT to fix components and engines, all it does it take more training. Go look around the MROs and Vendors where most component and engine work is done, many of them dont even have an A&P license. Many shops that airlines have or use to have dont require a license to fix, maintain or overhaul components, just one AMT to sign off the work.
So please show me how an AMT who overhauls an airplane and signing for his work is less qualified than someone sitting at a work bench or the AMT on the line, who troubleshoots what is wrong with the plane and then fixes it?
Your statement is an insults to the AMT Profession.
As you can see, DL has physical limits on what it can do and it is keeping more high value work in-house including doing alot of it for other airlines while allowing lower value work to be outsourced.
That reality is actually quite AFFIRMING to those people who have bothered to get their AMTs..
Kev,
the EA facility was far more capable than the old NW facility and DL chose to give it up along with the DFW facility... so the chances of DL reopening the ex-NW ATL facility are slim to none.
While we are on the topic, can you or summarize the maintenance facillties DL inherited with the merger along w/ their general capabilities, and whatwork is currently being done there?